Report: SCOTUS Allowing States to Hear Climate-change Cases

The United States Supreme Court decided Monday to allow several municipal climate change lawsuits against major oil companies to be allowed to proceed in their respective state courts.

NBC News reported that the decision impacts cases against “Big Oil” companies in Colorado, Maryland, California, Hawaii, and Rhode Island, where the plaintiffs believe they can prevail and win damages.

“Big Oil companies have been desperate to avoid trials in state courts, where they will be forced to defend their climate lies in front of juries, and today the Supreme Court declined to bail them out,” Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity, an environmental group told the news outlet Monday.

The report said business groups are unhappy with the decision and feel the cases should be heard at the national or international level.

“The challenge of our time is developing technologies and public policies so that the world can produce and use energy in ways that are affordable for people and sustainable for the planet,” Phil Goldberg, a lawyer with the National Association of Manufacturers’ said in the report. “It should not be figuring out how to creatively plead lawsuits that seek to monetize climate change and provide no solutions.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, municipalities in the five states are suing major oil companies including Chevron Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp., and Shell PLC, for “various environmental harms” committed under the respective state’s laws and caused by greenhouse gas emissions.

The Journal reported that Justice Samuel Alito did not take part in the cases because he owns shares in some of the involved companies.

“This was the right decision, and it is time to prepare for trial,” Sara Gross, an attorney with the Baltimore City Law Department told the Journal. “Since we filed this case nearly five years ago, the climate crisis has worsened, the costs to Baltimore taxpayers are skyrocketing, and the defendants have pocketed trillions of dollars in profits while trying to dodge accountability for their deception.”

That lawsuit, filed by the City of Baltimore in Maryland state court in 2018, claims that 20 different energy companies promoted the use of fossil fuels while hiding information about the damaging effects they had on the environment and climate, the report said.

“Today’s decision has no impact on our focus to invest billions of dollars to leading the way in a thoughtful energy transition that takes the world to net zero carbon emissions,” An Exxon spokesman told the Journal.