Crackdown on Anti-Israel protesters by Columbia and Google is a Victory for Rationality

Are entitled anti-Israel demonstrators finally facing consequences?

Recently, Columbia President Minouche Shafik requested the NYPD’s intervention to remove hundreds of protesters who had set up a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” on the South Lawn of Butler Library. The protesters had already disrupted the area by blocking sidewalks, leading to multiple arrests and even assaulting a police officer.

Prior to involving law enforcement, Columbia delivered warnings to the students about potential repercussions if they did not disperse. They also offered to address the protesters’ concerns if they moved away.

Shafik stated, “I took this unusual step due to the exceptional circumstances. The individuals behind the encampment violated various rules and policies.”

Testifying the day before about a series of hateful incidents at Columbia, she noted in a House Education and Workforce Committee hearing that students “understand that violations of our policies will lead to consequences.”

We appreciate Shafik’s commitment to follow through on her promise; Congress also deserves recognition for holding educational institutions accountable on this issue.

Traditionally, academia has treated anti-Israel protests with leniency, sending a message that they are permissible even when infused with rampant antisemitism.

It is imperative for students to witness administrators taking a stand and affirming that antisemitic behavior will not be tolerated simply because it originates from the left.

Columbia’s crackdown is reminiscent of Google’s dismissal of 28 employees participating in sit-in protests over the company’s dealings with Israel. Google’s internal memo warned, “Those thinking we will overlook policy violations, think again.”

Well done.

Continue to hold left-leaning demonstrators accountable for their actions.

There is cautious optimism that common sense is slowly resurfacing in liberal America, though expectations remain tempered.