Letters to the Editor: Why Congestion Pricing in NYC is Inefficient.

The Concern: Manhattan’s contentious congestion pricing program, scheduled for implementation on June 30.

Congestion pricing is viewed as a detrimental measure for businesses in our city and places a financial burden on commuters (“Railing no fare at MTA,” May 1).

The continuous taking without giving back by this administration is disheartening.

Mayor Adams has once again displayed his lack of leadership. Gov. Hochul brings shame to the office.

Alfred N. Bonnabel

Manhattan

Seeking to eliminate the negative impacts of congestion pricing while preserving its benefits may seem like a challenging task.

One way to align congestion pricing with public acceptance is by implementing tolls on the East and Harlem River bridges, and adjusting tolls on other bridges and tunnels in the region.

This strategy can minimize disruptions to neighborhoods above 60th Street and discourage evasive travel tactics to avoid tolls.

Implementing regional congestion pricing exclusively on bridges and tunnels offers a practical solution.

D.M. Markowitz

Schenectady

Despite congestion pricing coming into effect on June 30, it seems unlikely that the MTA will be able to fulfill contracts totaling $15 billion within the subsequent six months.

The integration of $15 billion worth of projects may face resource shortages, potential delays, and increased costs due to inflation. MTA board members and elected officials need to acknowledge these challenges.

Larry Penner

Great Neck

Enforcing congestion pricing could pose challenges for the police in apprehending toll evaders who tamper with their license plates, especially considering the high volume of vehicles entering the city below 60th Street.

Ted Rallis

Mamaroneck

The Issue: Judge Juan Merchan fining ex-President Donald Trump $9,000 for violating a gag order.

The $9,000 fine imposed on former President Donald Trump for violating a gag order seems uniquely targeted at him (“$9K the new ‘hush’ money,” May 1).

There appears to be a concerted effort by Democrats to emotionally and financially undermine Trump, possibly to prevent his candidacy. Trump, like any human, is subject to such pressures.

If Trump decides to pay the fine, it’s hoped that the trial is eventually dismissed or overturned to restore his reputation and funds.

Curbing Trump’s freedom of speech could set a precedent for the rest of the population if he isn’t re-elected in November.

JoAnn Lee Frank

Clearwater, Fla.

Judge Juan Merchan’s decision to fine Donald Trump $9,000 for contempt is a commendable stance.

However, the financial impact this fine has on Trump is minimal compared to an average person, much like imposing a nine-cent fine on a middle-class individual.

Denny Freidenrich

Laguna Beach, Calif.

Share your opinions on today’s news by emailing letters@nypost.com with your full name and city. Letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.