Biden becomes president due to CIA interference with ‘Spies Who Lie’ letter
It is concerning to think that without the interference of the CIA in the 2020 election, Donald Trump could have secured a second term, and the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza might not have occurred.
Recent revelations suggest that the CIA orchestrated a campaign of disinformation within the United States to shield their preferred candidate, Joe Biden, from the fallout of his corrupt actions.
Former CIA Director Gina Haspel’s involvement in the controversial “Dirty 51” letter, which falsely linked Hunter Biden’s laptop to Russian disinformation, has been exposed by Andrew Makridis, a former CIA Chief Operating Officer.
This revelation is a blatant act of subversion by a renegade intelligence agency against the American people.
This indicates that the CIA collaborated with the Biden campaign to undermine the credibility of the New York Post’s reporting on Biden’s involvement in questionable international dealings, as detailed on his son’s abandoned laptop.
Political Maneuvering
Makridis informed the House Judiciary Committee that he received a draft of the letter from the CIA’s Publication Classification Review Board and recognized its overt political nature on October 19, 2020.
Due to its political implications, he notified Director Haspel about the letter.
He testified that he believed the letter was exceptionally political and felt it necessary to make the director and deputy director (Vaughn Frederick Bishop at the time) aware of it. There was no discussion beyond notifying them of its imminent arrival.
“I mean, it’s talking about President Trump, Vice President Biden. I mean, you can’t read that and say there isn’t politics involved of some nature,” he testified in April 2024.
The letter claiming Russian involvement in the laptop was initially suggested by Biden’s campaign adviser Antony Blinken, which prompted former acting CIA director Mike Morell to write and gather signatures for the letter.
Five former CIA directors, including Morell, signed the letter, along with several other ex-CIA personnel. The letter was strategically timed to coincide with the final presidential debate to benefit Biden’s narrative against Trump.
Biden exploited the letter in the debate, dismissing the laptop as Russian propaganda, effectively quashing the issue.
The House Intelligence Committee and the Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government published a report on these events.
The report disclosed that some of the individuals involved were active contractors for the CIA at the time they participated in the deceptive letter.
While Morell denies these claims, a list of contractors provided to the committees by Robert Dugas, CIA deputy general counsel for litigation and investigations, includes his name.
Makridis later revised his testimony, suggesting he may have only shown the letter to Haspel’s deputy, Bishop, not Haspel herself.
Haspel’s proximity to anti-Trump schemes, including her involvement in Russiagate under mentor Brennan, raises questions about her integrity.
During her tenure as the CIA’s London station chief under Brennan, the Russiagate narrative emerged from a tenuous tip from Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer, which was used to justify the FBI’s investigations into Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia.
Lack of Transparency
Haspel’s refusal to comply with GOP inquiries about Russiagate and her blockage of declassified information on the matter raise further suspicions.
These actions, coupled with her history of animosity towards Trump, suggest a pattern of bias.
The CIA’s election interference in 2020, aided by the FBI’s tactics, deprived voters of essential information and influenced the election outcome.
Without these covert operations, the election may have had a different result, allowing voters to make informed decisions.
The repercussions of these actions extend to national security, as agencies like the CIA and FBI failed to uphold their duty to protect Americans.
