Fascist Rob Rakowitz seeks to dictate your reading choices – House rightfully rejects his efforts
Are you familiar with the Global Alliance for Responsible Media?
Chances are, you’re not, and that’s by design.
This secretive bureaucratic group aims to dictate what you can access, read, see, and hear online.
GARM, an initiative from the World Federation of Advertisers, wields significant control over around 90% of global marketing spending. It has used its considerable financial influence to target free speech online, as revealed in a recent House Judiciary Committee report.
The concept is straightforward.
GARM identifies websites they deem as spreading “disinformation.”
That term is often used to label valid information, like details found on Hunter Biden’s laptop or theories regarding the origin of COVID, which contradict the dominant narrative.
Under the GARM umbrella, the cartel, along with its extensive list of major company partners and large ad agencies, works to cut off advertising dollars to these websites.
At the center of GARM is Rob Rakowitz, who adopts a pseudo-fascist approach to being the ultimate censor of online content. He expresses frustration with what he sees as an “extreme global interpretation of the US Constitution” on speech matters.
He and his team go after familiar targets.
For example, they pressured Twitter soon after Elon Musk took it over, and they attempted to get Facebook to censor a Donald Trump campaign ad.
When Facebook refused, Rakowitz lamented it as “reprehensible.”
Rakowitz even went after Spotify for hosting Joe Rogan’s podcast, despite Rogan not having advertising agreements with any companies in the GARM cartel.
Rakowitz also endorsed the now-discredited Global Disinformation Index, a group based in London that targeted publications like Reason, RealClearPolitics, and The Post, likely due to their right-leaning or libertarian tendencies.
GDI seemed to provide GARM with its list of targets.
The group also received funding from the State Department, another method through which the White House tried to suppress free speech and independent thought.
It’s a complex web that operates just outside the boundaries of legal censorship but still engages in heavy censorship.
Individuals like Rakowitz, with tyrannical tendencies, drive this agenda forward.
The Judiciary Committee has worked diligently to reveal the various aspects of this troubling situation, and this latest report is crucial.
The Committee suggests that GARM may have violated antitrust laws with its oppressive actions.
The perpetrators of misinformation must be held accountable under the law, no matter how long it takes.
Otherwise, individuals like Rakowitz, promoting real disinformation, will prevail.
