Biden adopts Obama’s tactics of delegitimization and now faces the consequences of using inflammatory language

The White House is currently dealing with a dilemma – how to argue against Donald Trump without likening him to a quasi-Nazi, especially following his recent assassination attempt?

In his Oval Office address, Joe Biden called for toning down political rhetoric, but failed to acknowledge any faults on his part or his allies’ role in escalating tensions.

The attacks on Trump have been a focal point of the Democratic campaign, rather than incidental.

If Biden had been more cautious in criticizing Trump, he would have had very little to say in recent years.

Despite Biden’s statements, the main focus remains on Trump, with exaggerated characterizations likening him to an extremist threatening democracy.

This rhetoric has been endorsed by prominent figures in the Democratic Party, further contributing to a sense of fear and division.

These tactics have raised the stakes for the 2024 election, with efforts to portray the fight against Trump as an existential battle.

Following the recent assassination attempt, even Democrats are questioning the escalating rhetoric and its consequences.

Biden’s strategy mirrors Obama’s approach in 2012, vilifying the opponent in order to mobilize the base, but has resulted in more extreme polarization.

Unlike past presidents, Biden has avoided moving towards the center and has governed from a more left-leaning position.

With the recent events at political rallies, there is a growing sense of shock and concern about the current political climate.

Perhaps it’s time for Democrats to critique Trump’s policies without resorting to hyperbolic and inflammatory comparisons?

Twitter: @RichLowry