A visually impaired athlete, who previously competed as a man, should not transition to racing against women in the Paralympics.

Valentina Petrillo, a visually impaired sprinter, will soon make history as the first openly transgender athlete to compete in the Paralympic Games. Despite Petrillo being a man, transitioning to a woman, and competing against females, the issue of fairness in women’s sports is clouded by the narrative of inclusivity at all costs.

Petrillo, a former national champion in visually-impaired categories, transitioned in 2019 after winning various titles as a man. This transition raised questions about fairness, especially after Petrillo won bronze in women’s events at the Para Athletics World Championships. The upcoming Paralympic Games in Paris will serve as a platform for Petrillo to advocate for inclusion in sports.

The controversy surrounding Petrillo’s participation in women’s sports highlights the ongoing debate about transgender athletes competing in categories based on self-identification rather than biological sex. While technically allowed within the rules set by sports governing bodies, the issue of fairness remains a concern, especially in sports like track and field where physical advantages can play a significant role.

Despite the controversy, Petrillo remains firm in her belief that she deserves the opportunity to compete based on her gender identity. This stance has sparked debates about the need for a third, open category in sports to ensure fairness for all athletes, regardless of their gender identity.

As the Paralympic Games approach, the debate about transgender athletes in sports continues, with calls for a more scientifically guided approach to ensure fairness and inclusivity for all athletes. The importance of maintaining fairness while celebrating the spirit of these elite athletes remains a key focus in the ongoing discussions surrounding transgender participation in sports.