Congestion pricing is for the community, not for individuals

Gov. Hochul’s recent decision on congestion pricing reveals the true motive behind pushing the program.

It’s not about reducing congestion, but rather about increasing revenue for the state.

However, this new tax will only apply to the private sector, leaving city government employees exempt.

After the upcoming elections, Hochul may reconsider the paused congestion toll, possibly implementing a lower fee and exempting certain city workers.

This reversal would eliminate any justification for congestion pricing.

The original study by the MTA focused on reducing Manhattan traffic and raising funds, considering alternatives such as limiting parking permits for city workers.

Exempting city workers from the congestion fee could lead to increased traffic from this group, undermining the goal of reducing congestion.

Hochul’s plan change also indicates a shift away from congestion pricing as a solution for MTA’s financial needs.

The exemption of public sector workers and potential fee reductions may not generate the expected revenue, prompting Hochul to seek other sources of taxation.

Overall, exempting city workers aligns with New York’s Democratic governance, emphasizing government convenience over public interests.

If congestion pricing is to be implemented, it should apply to all drivers equally.

It seems that Hochul’s decision has stalled the congestion pricing plan for the foreseeable future.

Nicole Gelinas is a contributing editor to the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal.