The significance of Harris’ strategic silence on climate change

During last week’s Democratic National Convention, one word, “climate,” a major concern for the party’s base, was notably absent.

The reason behind this absence can be summed up in one word: Pennsylvania.

Kevin Book, managing director of Clearview Energy Partners, explained to reporters that the Democrats are hesitant to push a strong climate position, as it may appear too progressive for Pennsylvania, a crucial state in the election.

Discussing climate and fracking creates a dilemma for Democrats at the moment. Supporting anti-carbon policies could cost Harris votes in Pennsylvania, while backing fracking risks losing support from young climate voters. Ultimately, winning Pennsylvania is the top priority for Democrats.

Harris’ history of supporting a ban on fracking and the Biden-Harris administration’s stance on fossil fuels have raised concerns in Pennsylvania and other states about potential anti-fracking policies under a Harris presidency.

Fracking is a lucrative industry in Pennsylvania, employing many residents with high salaries and contributing significantly to state revenue. Banning fracking would not be well-received in Pennsylvania, especially given Harris’ choice of a running mate who is against fracking.

Despite indications from a spokesperson that Harris no longer supports a fracking ban, there has been no direct statement from her to confirm this change in stance.

The absence of significant climate discussion at the convention, along with the lack of protest from climate activists and media, is notable. Inslee, a Democratic governor known for his focus on climate change, believes it is more important for Harris to differentiate herself from Trump than to delve into specific policy details.

While Democrats remain largely silent on the topic of climate and fracking at the moment, Harris’ campaign has garnered support from the climate industry. This industry is betting on Harris to continue the fight against fossil fuels, potentially including a ban on fracking.

Despite the silence on climate during the campaign, the climate industry is actively supporting Harris through fundraising and ad campaigns. Whether this strategy will be successful remains to be seen.

While climate is an important issue for some voters, polls have shown that it is not a top priority for most. The focus on climate tends to appeal more to certain segments of the population, but may not be enough to secure victory in crucial states like Pennsylvania.

Steve Milloy is a senior legal fellow with the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute and is on X at @JunkScience.