Conclusion of Trial for Freedom Convoy Organizers, Verdict Expected in Six Months

September 13, 2024 TruthUSA

The trial for Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, originally set to last 16 days, has finally concluded over a year later. However, a decision may still be up to six months away.

Justice Heather Perkins-McVey informed the Ottawa court on Sept. 13 that she was uncertain when she would reach a decision. Coming to a conclusion is a challenging task due to the case’s size and complexity, as well as the numerous other trials she is overseeing. She scheduled a “check-in date” for Nov. 17 after consulting with Crown and defense attorneys at the conclusion of the hearing.

Lich and Barber face charges of mischief, intimidation, and incitement to break the law, with Barber also accused of inciting others to defy a court order.

The Freedom Convoy protest began in response to COVID-19 restrictions and vaccine mandates, resulting in a large assembly of vehicles in downtown Ottawa to protest these measures.

The federal government invoked the Emergencies Act on Feb. 14 to disband the demonstration, granting law enforcement expanded powers to arrest demonstrators and freeze the bank accounts of those involved. Lich and Barber were apprehended on Feb. 17, a day before law enforcement actions to end the protest commenced.

The trial of the two accused experienced delays due to intricate legal arguments, technical issues, and disclosure delays.

The Crown contends that the evidence against Lich and Barber is substantial, alleging they utilized illegal means to further their political objectives. Defense lawyers argue there is little evidence of criminal intent or close collaboration between Lich and Barber in organizing and guiding the protesters in Ottawa.

Closing Arguments

In his closing arguments on Aug. 23, Lich’s defense attorney Lawrence Greenspon asserted that in a clash between charter-protected freedom of expression and residents’ right to enjoy their property, charter rights take precedence.

For the Crown’s closing arguments on Sept. 13, Siobhain Wetscher emphasized that every right has limits, including the right to defend beliefs.

Wetscher stated, “Mr. Barber, nor Ms. Lich, are on trial for their beliefs. And moreover, an honestly-held belief doesn’t provide the authority to do the things that were done in this case, in the name of so-called peaceful demonstration.”

The Crown previously argued that Lich and Barber pressured Ottawa residents and the federal government to achieve their political aims, crossing the line from peaceful protest to criminal activity. They also asserted that the two collaborated closely enough that evidence concerning one organizer should apply to the other, known as a Carter Application.

Greenspon challenged the unprecedented use of a Carter Application by the Crown in a case where the common goal is legal. Barber’s attorney Diane Magas argued that the phrase “hold the line,” cited by the Crown as counseling others to break the law, has various interpretations such as “be patient” or “stay true to your beliefs.”

Although Barber and Lich were physically present at the trial hearings, both participated in the final day via video conference as Lich is in Alberta and Barber is in Saskatchewan. In a Facebook post after the conclusion of the court hearing, Lich expressed gratitude to everyone who supported them by attending court, sending messages, and contributing to their legal fund.

“As the trial phase of our criminal trial wraps up, I can’t help but feel thankful for the love and support I’ve received from Canadians and people around the world,” Lich said.

Source link