John Robson argues for refraining from using ‘ideology’ as a slur
Commentary
When I express my political opinions, not everyone accepts them right away. I attribute this to my principles, your stubbornness, and that person over there being an ideologue. And if you doubt me, just ask anyone. Well, except that guy over there who calls me an ideologue. Hmm…
Insults are rampant, but they lack substance. For example, labeling a Canadian health care report as non-ideological or ideological doesn’t actually reveal anything about the report itself or the reasons behind differing opinions. On the other hand, attributing socialist or centrist views to it provides more context. Simply resorting to calling someone an ideologue without substantiation is reminiscent of childish name-calling.
Some argue that “ideologue” implies extremism or a disregard for facts. However, centrism, often dismissed as an ideology, also offers valid solutions by finding a middle ground. Thomas Kuhn’s work, particularly “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” sheds light on how individuals handle evidence and legitimate disagreements.
Kuhn’s paradigm challenges the traditional view of science as incremental progress. It emphasizes bold assumptions, problem-solving, and the periodic need for revolutionary shifts in thinking. Similarly, in economics, the debate between mathematical modelling proponents and skeptics highlights the complexity of paradigms and their limitations.
Understanding any field involves a framework that interprets experiences and facts. It’s unrealistic to expect a single contradictory fact to dismantle an entire scientific or political worldview. The classification of ideologies can be divisive and flawed, leading to oversimplified judgments and distorted perspectives.
It’s crucial to engage in debates based on evidence rather than dismissing differing viewpoints. Political figures urging unity without addressing fundamental disagreements risk promoting conformity over critical thinking.
Ultimately, it’s acceptable to have an ideology as long as it’s chosen thoughtfully and understood thoroughly. Dissenting opinions are vital for meaningful discourse and progress.
Only an ideologue would argue otherwise.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
