Canadians Require Legislation for the Protection of Their Rights by John Carpay
Commentary
In September, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced the addition of the right to make personal choices regarding vaccinations to the Alberta Bill of Rights, emphasizing that “No Albertan should be compelled or coerced into accepting medical treatment without their full consent.”
While some argue that additional laws safeguarding bodily autonomy are unnecessary due to the protection already provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, others believe that explicit protections are required.
Under the Charter, individuals have the right to make medical decisions, including the choice to receive vaccines, and any health orders that infringe on these Charter rights must be justified with compelling evidence.
However, recent court rulings have raised concerns about judges upholding government measures without adequate explanation or evidence, leading to skepticism about the protection offered by the Charter.
Recent rulings have cast doubt on the efficacy of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in protecting citizens’ rights, underscoring the need for legislative changes to safeguard individuals from undue government interference.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.