Rachel Reeves is not expected to announce new freeports in the budget, despite previous statements suggesting otherwise.

October 28, 2024 TruthUSA

Freeports are designated zones within the UK’s borders where businesses benefit from reduced customs regulations and tax incentives.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will not announce any new freeports in her Budget, despite an earlier government press release confirming plans for five more tax-free sites.

In what is understood to be a U-turn on freeport construction plans, the government is now expected to confirm funding for the “next steps” for five of the existing freeport locations.

Current freeports are located in 12 locations—eight in England and two each in Scotland and Wales.

These sites benefit from a generous package of incentives, including generous tax reliefs and wide-ranging support from the government to help businesses trade, invest, and innovate.

Freeports are usually based at ports or airports. Existing UK freeports are located around ports in Inverness, the Forth, Teesside, the Humber, Liverpool, Anglesey, Milford Haven, Plymouth, the Solent, the Thames, and Felixstowe and Harwich.

Special customs facilities enable the freeports to import inputs tariff-free and pay tariffs on finished goods only when they are placed on the market. Other benefits include tax breaks on hiring new staff.

Seven freeports have operational custom zones, with Reeves expected to say that further five will be added to the existing sites at Liverpool, Humber, and the Inverness and Cromarty Firth Green freeport in Scotland.

Confusion

Last week, Downing Street said that Reeves will announce “a new investment zone in the East Midlands and five new freeports as part of the Government’s package of measures to fix the foundations and rebuild the country.”

However, the report by The Financial Times said that port executives and local mayors were confused by the announcement and said they were aware of the plans outlined by Downing Street.

The government clarified on Sunday evening that the upcoming Budget will announce three freeports across five sites already in place, as reported by the PA news agency.

During his visit to Samoa on Oct. 25, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer responded to a question about the announcement of five new freeports.

Starmer said that he didn’t want to take an “ideological view” on freeports, just because they were introduced by the previous Conservative government.

“We looked at them, they are working well, I think they can work better. So rather than stand them down, we’re going to go with it, but we’re going to make some improvements so they work even better,” Starmer said.

He added freeports could work better if local authorities and business get more involved. This aligns with Labour’s economic growth strategy, which it believes should be championed by regional powers.

Under Labour’s Local Growth Plans, partnerships between local authorities and businesses will deliver growth and productivity across the country.

“The ‘everyday economy,’ which makes up over two-thirds of jobs in the North East, Yorkshire and the Humber and the South West, will be at the heart of these plans,” Labour said.

Misuse

According to the guidance on freeports, published under the Conservative government, each site has up to three “tax sites,” selected by local councils and aimed to attract investment and boost job growth.

However, critics suggest freeports will simply displace jobs, rather than create new jobs.

In 2020 Rosa Crawford, a policy officer at the Trade Union Congress, wrote a blog in which she said: “There’s no evidence that free ports create jobs or stimulate growth—and they could be a Trojan horse for watering down employment protections after Brexit.”

Tax Justice UK, which campaigns for a better tax system, has warned that “dubious” benefits of freeports come with high risks of money laundering and criminality.

“The sums spent in tax cuts could be repurposed as direct capital investment in port infrastructure,” the campaign said.

Trade union Unite has cautioned that strong union action is necessary to prevent the misuse of pocket tax cuts by corporate bosses and protect pay for workers.

PA Media contributed to this report.

Source link