Meta Says Harmless Content Removed Too Often, Vows to Improve Moderation
Meta says it has given users options for more political content recommendations, and limited penalties for content violations to persistent offenders only.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, said on Dec. 3 that harmless content was too often removed by mistake from its platforms during elections worldwide and pledged to improve its content moderation practices.
Nick Clegg, president of global affairs for Meta, said the tech giant has worked throughout the year to update and apply its content policies “fairly” to protect users’ freedom of expression on its platforms.
To address the issue, Clegg said that Meta has launched political content controls on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads to give users the option to receive more political content recommendations.
The tech giant also updated its penalties system to ensure that penalties would apply only to users who persistently violate the company’s policy.
Clegg said that Meta removed 20 covert influence operations globally this year. Russia remains “the number one source” of these operations, with 39 networks disrupted since 2017, followed by Iran and China.
Several Russian state media outlets were banned from Meta-owned platforms ahead of the U.S. presidential election over alleged foreign interference, he stated.
Clegg said that Meta will continue updating its moderation policies in the coming months to strike a balance between free expression and protecting users from false information, though he believed that “no platform will ever get [this] right 100 per cent of the time.”
COVID-19 Content
During a press call on Monday, Clegg acknowledged that Meta may have over-enforced its content moderation policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the removal of large volumes of content.
The tech giant became aware of its mistakes after receiving complaints from users whose posts had been unfairly removed from its social media platforms.
Zuckerberg said the government pressure was “wrong” and expressed regrets for yielding to those demands.
Zuckerberg said that Meta would push back if the government tried to interfere again. The White House defended its move by saying that it encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety.
Meta censored content about COVID-19, lockdowns, or vaccines or that otherwise went against its policies during the pandemic.
Stephen Katte and Reuters contributed to this report.