US News

Agency Reports Rise in Vaccine Injury Claims During COVID Pandemic, Yet Reimbursements Remain Low


Of the 13,333 claims related to COVID-19, only 92 were deemed eligible.

A recent report from a federal congressional agency reveals that a review of the U.S. vaccine injury compensation program indicates that fewer than 3 percent of finalized claims during the initial years of the COVID-19 pandemic qualified for reimbursement.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported on December 18 that its investigation into the Health and Human Services (HHS) Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) uncovered a rise in claims, totaling 13,333 COVID-19 claims—approximately 27 times the number of claims filed in the program’s first decade.

The program reviewed about 25 percent of all claims submitted and found that only 92 of “the completed claims were eligible for compensation,” representing roughly 3 percent of the total, according to the GAO’s report.

According to GAO, “Most individuals who receive vaccinations or treatments for specific public health threats, including COVID-19 vaccines, experience no serious adverse effects. However, as with any medication, there is a rare possibility of injury or even death.” The agency pointed out that legislation has “restricted industry liability” to “promote the development of these vaccines.”

As of June this year, the program has disbursed around $6.5 million in compensation for claims, noting that the most severe injuries, like Guillain-Barré syndrome, were linked to the H1N1 influenza vaccine, as highlighted by the GAO’s report.

A smaller fraction, as reported by GAO, was “allocated for injuries associated with COVID-19 countermeasures, such as myocarditis (an inflammatory heart condition).” For these claims, merely $400,000 has been dispensed.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, myocarditis, which is an inflammation of the heart’s middle muscle layer, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the membrane surrounding the heart, are recognized side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines.

Moreover, the GAO found that the increase in COVID-19 vaccine injury claims was made during a period of “staff shortages and outdated information systems,” compounded by a lack of scientific evidence determining whether injuries or fatalities were directly linked to the COVID-19 countermeasures.

“Consequently, reviewers meticulously evaluated each case to determine eligibility for benefits, which prolonged the claims adjudication process,” the report stated.

This report emerged just days after House Oversight Republicans criticized the U.S. vaccine injury reporting systems and associated compensation programs for being ineffective and in need of enhancement.

They stated that “Vaccine injury reporting systems caused confusion, inadequately informed the American public regarding vaccine injuries, and undermined public trust in vaccine safety during the COVID-19 pandemic,” as expressed on December 2 in their findings.

The officials also claimed that the U.S. has been “inefficiently, unfairly, and non-transparently adjudicating claims for those injured by the COVID-19 vaccine.”

This month, the Biden administration extended liability protections for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, healthcare providers, and others until 2029, stirring discussions about accountability concerning vaccine injuries.

The extension, signed by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra on December 11, ensures that a rule initially established in 2020 under the PREP Act remains effective, which grants immunity from liability to foster the development and distribution of medical countermeasures, including vaccines and treatments.

Following Donald Trump’s election victory in November, he indicated his intention to nominate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a known critic of COVID-19 vaccines and mandates, to oversee HHS, a move that would require Senate approval. Kennedy recently commented that he doubts the vaccines prevent the virus’s transmission.

“In May 2020, I recognized that the vaccines would not stop transmission because I was reviewing the primate studies,” he informed NBC News, adding that he would not eliminate the vaccines if they “are effective.”

“If vaccines are beneficial for some individuals, I will not take them away. People should have the freedom to choose, informed by comprehensive information. I will ensure that studies on scientific safety and efficacy are accessible so individuals can make personal decisions regarding whether that product is suitable for them.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.