US News

US Prosecutor Addresses Medical Journal, Accusing It of Bias


U.S. Attorney Edward Martin has communicated with CHEST through an official letter.

A federal prosecutor has addressed a medical journal via letter, inquiring about its selection process for articles, as confirmed by the journal’s publishers.

“The American College of Chest Physicians, which publishes the journal CHEST, can confirm that we have received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice, and its contents were made public online without our consent,” stated a spokesperson for the college in an email to The Epoch Times on April 21.

“Our legal counsel is currently assessing the DOJ’s request. At this moment, we have no further comments beyond our statement.”

The letter, dated April 14, was sent by Edward Martin, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

Martin expressed concerns that journals are acknowledging their roles as partisans in various scientific discussions, claiming they advocate for specific positions due to advertisements (under postal code) or sponsorships (under applicable fraud regulations).

He requested that Dr. Peter Mazzone, the editor-in-chief of CHEST, respond to five inquiries, including whether the journal accepts submissions presenting opposing viewpoints.

“I am also curious to know if you, your publishing partners, or any journals are modifying their criteria for accepting competing viewpoints,” Martin wrote. “Are new standards being put in place?”

He requested a response by May 2.

Martin’s office did not reply to a request for comment by the time of publication.

The American College of Chest Physicians stated on its website that CHEST has a legacy of 90 years, during which it has “published numerous groundbreaking articles in scientific research and clinical treatment, contributing to the advancement of the medical profession and enhancing patient health globally.”

The college affirmed that the journal adheres to ethical guidelines and upholds the editorial independence of the publication.

It remains unclear whether similar letters were dispatched to other journals. A representative from PLOS informed The Epoch Times via email that it had not received such correspondence. Other journals did not respond to inquiries.

Numerous free speech advocacy groups protested the letter, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

“The First Amendment is unequivocal: A publication’s editorial choices are not the concern of the government. Whether it’s a newspaper, blog, or medical journal—it is none of their business. They need to disengage,” the organization stated on X on April 18.

“When a U.S. Attorney uses the power of his office to scrutinize medical journals based on their content, he fails to fulfill his duties and undermines his constitutional vows. This constitutes an abuse of authority aimed at suppressing protected speech.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.