Trump Signs Directive to Enhance Law Enforcement力度

April 28, 2025 TruthUSA

The directive aims to ensure that officers prioritize crime-fighting over equity initiatives.

President Donald Trump has instructed the Department of Justice to take measures to enhance law enforcement capabilities and to ensure that officers avoid focusing on equity-related policies.

“When local leaders criticize law enforcement and impose legal and political restrictions that hinder effective law enforcement, crime flourishes, putting innocent citizens and small business owners at risk,” Trump remarked in an executive order issued on April 28.

“Thus, my Administration will: establish best practices at the state and local level to empower robust local police forces; defend law enforcement officers who are wrongly accused or mistreated by state or local authorities; and allocate additional resources to officers who require assistance.”

His order specifically targets “illegal race- and sex-based ‘equity’ policies,” directing the attorney general to “take appropriate action to facilitate legal resources and indemnification for law enforcement officers who unjustly incur costs and liabilities while performing their official duties to enforce the law.”

In addition, the order seeks to enhance law enforcement resources by ordering the eventual allocation of surplus military and national security assets to support local authorities. The attorney general is directed to optimize the use of federal resources for various purposes, such as increasing officer salaries and benefits, improving prison security investments, and expanding access to training for state and local law enforcement.

Another focus of the order is to hold state and local officials accountable for obstructing criminal law enforcement and unlawfully engaging in civil rights violations “under the guise of ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ initiatives.”

The presidential directive coincided with Trump signing two additional orders, including one aimed at ensuring that jurisdictions with sanctuary policies comply with federal regulations. Trump accused certain state and local officials of conducting a “lawless insurrection” by obstructing federal immigration enforcement.

This order followed the Justice Department’s response to local officials allegedly working against federal immigration enforcement.

Recently, the department filed a lawsuit against the City of Rochester in New York regarding its sanctuary policies. The lawsuit, submitted in federal court, came after Rochester Mayor Malik Evans accused local police of potentially breaching city policy by responding to a request from the Department of Homeland Security on March 24 during a press conference. He stated that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and that local police do not participate in it.

A similar lawsuit was initiated in February against state officials concerning New York’s Green Light Law, which allows noncitizens to apply for driver’s licenses while restricting the Department of Motor Vehicles from disclosing information to immigration enforcement.

On April 25, the Justice Department also announced that a Milwaukee County judge was charged with allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement activities regarding a Mexican national previously removed from the country.

Judge Hannah Dugan’s attorney claimed during a court session that his client “deeply regrets and contests her arrest, which was not conducted in the interest of public safety.” FBI Director Kash Patel publicized her arrest on April 25, asserting that her “obstruction created heightened risks to the public.”

Trump has faced a surge of lawsuits in recent months, particularly regarding his actions against sanctuary jurisdictions and diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

On the same day the lawsuit was filed, a federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from withdrawing funding from cities with sanctuary policies. Trump had issued an executive order on January 20 directing the attorney general and secretary of homeland security to “evaluate and pursue any lawful actions to ensure that so-called ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions… do not gain access to federal funds.”

U.S. District Judge William Orrick noted in an opinion that Trump’s attempt to withhold funding designated by Congress infringed on the separation of powers and the Spending Clause, which grants Congress the authority to tax and allocate revenues.

Source link