News

Anthony Fauci Questioned on COVID-19 Response – One America News Network


Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies before the House Oversight and Accountability Committee Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic at the Rayburn House Office Building on June 03, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

OAN’s Brooke Mallory
3:54 PM – Monday, June 3, 2024

On Monday, Republican senators vehemently questioned Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former leading authority on infectious diseases in the United States until he left the government in 2022, over the origins of the COVID-19 virus and the pandemic.

Advertisement

Over a year has been spent by a Republican-led subcommittee investigating the country’s response to the outbreak and if research financed by the United States in China contributed to it.

Democrats began the session by claiming that there is currently no proof that Fauci did anything improper.

Fauci, who was said to be a reliable source during the pandemic, faced intense questioning from the House subcommittee in private for two days in January, lasting fourteen hours. For the first time since he left the government after more than 50 years of service, they questioned him once more on Monday, both in front of the public and on camera.

This time, he was confronted with fresh doubts over the reliability of his previous organization, the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Emails from an NIH colleague about how to get around public records rules were made public by the House subcommittee last month.

One such tactic was to avoid bringing up contentious topics in official government emails.

Leading scientists originally maintained that the virus originated in the wild and spread from animals to humans, at a market in Wuhan, the outbreak’s starting point. The narrative revolved around how exotic game was being sold for human consumption at the Huanan Seafood Market.

U.S. intelligence agencies also still claim that there “isn’t enough evidence” to support the lab leak position.

However, Alina Chan, a Harvard and MIT molecular biologist, says that the COVID-19 virus most certainly came from the Chinese laboratory, and that the U.S. should be held accountable for funding highly risky research on contagious diseases and viruses at a facility with inadequate safety measures, while funding this kind of work with U.S. taxpayer money.

She also labeled the incident “the most costly accident in the history of science.”

Her research revealed a concerning picture of how the virus originated in China, was enhanced for maximum contagiousness with assistance from the U.S. government, and was eventually permitted to escape under insufficient control circumstances.

In the beginning, Fauci publicly stated that while he was open to both possibilities, there was supposedly more evidence that pointed to COVID-19’s “natural origins,” not a lab leak.

Samples from diseased individuals and animals were previously gathered by Wuhan researchers in an attempt to get further insight into the extremely contagious characteristics of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.

According to Chan, a significant portion of this work was carried out in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based scientific group studying infectious diseases that has received more than $80 million in funding from the federal government since 2002.

However, Fauci now seemed to be backtracking his previous statements.

“I have repeatedly stated that I have a completely open mind to either possibility and that if definitive evidence becomes available to validate or refute either theory, I will ready accept it,” Fauci said at Monday’s hearing.

Republicans have also charged Fauci with lying to Congress when he denied in May 2022 that his agency had supported “gain of function” research at a Wuhan facility, which is the process of modifying a virus in the lab in order to examine its possible effects in the real world.

“Americans were aggressively bullied, shamed and silenced for merely questioning or debating issues such as social distancing, masks, vaccines or the origins of COVID,” said Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio).

“Whether intentional or not, you became so powerful, that any disagreements that the public had with you were hidden or censored on socials….This is why many Americans became so angry. Because this was fundamentally un-American,” Congressman Wenstrup added.

… (Rest of the content)



Source link

TruthUSA

I'm TruthUSA, the author behind TruthUSA News Hub located at https://truthusa.us/. With our One Story at a Time," my aim is to provide you with unbiased and comprehensive news coverage. I dive deep into the latest happenings in the US and global events, and bring you objective stories sourced from reputable sources. My goal is to keep you informed and enlightened, ensuring you have access to the truth. Stay tuned to TruthUSA News Hub to discover the reality behind the headlines and gain a well-rounded perspective on the world.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.