Opinions

Americans are in agreement with Trump’s energy policy



When it comes to Americans who value uninterrupted access to electricity and affordable fuel for their cars, the choice for president is clear.

Donald Trump advocates for increased oil and gas production, emphasizing a “drill, baby, drill” strategy that promises to keep power plants running and energy supplies plentiful, ultimately keeping prices down.

In contrast, Kamala Harris plans to continue her campaign against fossil fuels, threatening to ban gas appliances and conventional cars, which could jeopardize the nation’s electric grid and lead to escalating prices.

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at McCamish Pavilion Monday, Oct. 28, 2024, in Atlanta, Ga. AP

Trump pledges to be the “American energy president” and aims to halve energy costs through his proactive measures to boost US production and maintain reasonable prices.

In his first term, Trump achieved energy independence and kept prices low, and he now plans to further enhance US production to continue price stability.

Trump’s agenda includes reducing regulations, accelerating approvals for new power plants, promoting nuclear energy, and dismantling numerous Biden-Harris anti-fossil-fuel policies.

Opposite to Harris, Pennsylvania voters can trust that Trump will not ban fracking, a crucial industry in the state that supports numerous jobs and generates significant revenue.

While Harris claims she won’t ban fracking, her past statements indicate otherwise, aligning with her previous presidential campaign stance to ban it.

Pump jacks and wells are seen in an oil field on the Monterey Shale formation where gas and oil extraction using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is on the verge of a boom on March 23, 2014 near McKittrick, California. Getty Images

Furthermore, Trump supports nuclear energy, opposes EV mandates, expedites pipeline approvals, and rejects the Paris Climate Accord.

Harris supported the Green New Deal and the Inflation Reduction Act, which directed significant funds towards the green industrial sector.

During her tenure as California’s attorney general, she targeted oil companies for scrutiny, bolstering her anti-fossil-fuel credibility.

Fracking site near Midland, Texas on August 22, 2019. REUTERS/Jessica Lutz/File Photo/File Photo

The adverse effects of the Biden-Harris energy policies became apparent with soaring gas prices that averaged $3.61 a gallon, compared to $2.58 under Trump.

Trump’s policies could have supported a higher oil production of 16 million barrels a day, but under Biden-Harris, it remained at around 13 million barrels due to excessive regulations.

For Americans who prioritize a stable energy future and a thriving economy, supporting Trump is crucial.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.