Are Democrats Introducing Apartheid by Health-Stealth?

Spread the love


The 16 States that met Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate to fully inoculate at least 70 percent of adults by July 4 were all Democrat. New York state has had its “Excelsior Pass” in place since March and, on Aug. 16, Mayor Bill de Blasio rolled out his COVID Safe App. to prevent the unvaccinated gaining access to restaurants, gyms, and performance venues in New York City.

Now California is making its COVID vaccine records available on-line and Los Angeles City Council has recently approved a new ordinance requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination to enter indoor restaurants, shopping malls, movie theatres, hair salons, and other venues.

It’s beginning to look a lot like… apartheid and, most likely, will be coming to Democrat states first. By the beginning of September seven U.S. states had developed COVID apps while twenty-two had banned them. The split was mainly along predictable political lines, though the erstwhile red state Arizona joined the banning side.

It was the Democratic Party that once fought to keep slavery and later introduced segregation. Now they are introducing discriminatory laws to deprive the unvaccinated of employment, through their jab-or-job policy, and entrance to many places.

This even goes beyond segregation. The “coloreds,” as Democrats once labelled their fellow Americans, were allowed to have jobs and to eat in some of the same restaurants at the same time, just in different parts. Now, fifty years later, the Dems are once again clamping down on individual liberties with legislation that suits one section of society and violates another.

So outrageous and harsh are the terms being imposed on people who choose not to take the not fully safety-tested COVID vaccine that it poses the question, is it all being done intentionally to spark a reaction—an actual insurrection that would allow the Democrats to clamp down even further?

When a government becomes more focused on controlling its own citizenry than on external threats, it’s a sign that it has turned both totalitarian and afraid.

Following the Jan. 6 break-in at Capitol Hill that lasted for three hours, during which time an unarmed female protestor, Ashli Babbitt, was shot and killed, the Biden administration deployed 25,000 national guard troops to defend the building from a repeat incident that never materialized. That is, they didn’t kill any more unarmed protestors.

The troops were reduced significantly after the inauguration, but when they were stood down, five months later, they still numbered 2,500. During that time the southern border was experiencing hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants breaking into America.

And while U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, was making plans to treat U.S. parents as domestic terrorists for criticizing school boards over their curriculum choices, his administration gifted the Taliban control of Afghanistan, plus billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. military equipment.

It was a similar kind of governmental paranoia that led to the building of the Berlin Wall by communist East Germany in 1961—not to keep enemies out, but to keep its own citizens in.

When the wall eventually came down on Nov. 9, 1989, it gave East Berliners access to the West for the first time in 28 years. The event also came to symbolize the collapse of communism across Eastern Europe, being replaced by Western democracy in most countries.

No one was thinking about what might be going the other way.

Two years earlier Ronald Reagan made his famous speech at the Brandenburg Gate, goading Russian leader Michael Gorbachev to “tear down this wall!” Less well known is that, at the start of his political career, Reagan prophetically warned delegates at the 1964 Republican National Convention that Americans should not take liberty for granted either.

He told them: “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”

The Gipper’s advice is particularly apropos today. The centralized control of the Kremlin, which failed its people so miserably, seems to be finding a new home in the Democratic Party, although it has reached them via Beijing.

A critique of communism used to be that it couldn’t work economically—even Russia, its main home for 70 years, eventually rejected it for capitalism. However, one-time Chinese Communist Party leader, Deng Xiaoping, saw that by embracing both systems, economic liberalism could be harnessed to finance and maintain communist political control. His reforms came just in time for China’s reacquisition of Hong Kong from the British in 1997 and led to its membership in the WTO in 2001.

China has since become an economic superpower, although it is not just its wealth but its one-party model that has begun to appeal in the West. China’s gift of lockdowns has given Western governments a taste of what real power tastes like.

Already Western countries mostly adopt uni-party compliance in areas such as climate change and vaccines, but democracy can still get odd-balls like Donald Trump elected to oppose the globalist consensus, so has it outlived its usefulness for them?

Slavery and segregation were ultimately about control, and through its draconian vaccination laws the Democrats are showing they haven’t lost that craving.

What will happen if they lose in 2024?

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Andrew Davies


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.