Candace Owens LEAVES Leftist Professor SPEECHLESS In Congress

Spread the love


I just have to say that i object strenuously to your use of the worst word hilarious um to me. This feels a lot like your reaction to being named in one of these manifestos now, you’re, of course, not responsible for the words of somebody writing that document. But i do think that laughing at it is a real problem, because these are real families that are impacted by this violence. And i think our efforts towards talking about this have to start from a place of mutual respect, which is what i’ve heard. From from this side of the table now the reason we don’t have those numbers – i want those numbers as much as you do, but the number to say the numbers don’t show something is simply not supported by the data. Okay – and i have 38 seconds left. Ms mulligan, if you can, if you want to respond within that time, the only thing i would add is that um, it’s in the name, terrorism, domestic terrorism, it terrorizes us it terrorizes us in our homes, it terrorizes us in our schools, um and the and to The points made by the other panelists, it is disproportionate um to its impact on any individual life, and it’s not. You reject the idea of something that doesn’t matter or it doesn’t really matter absolutely reject. Okay, all right! So here’s where we are every every member now has had five minutes and okay and mr clay. So we have two members who have not so i’m going to go to the two members who have not yet and then and we’ll give an opportunity for a closing thought to any member who wants before we go. Am i next to responders mr medellin? I thought mr meadows was about us okay, mr meadows. Next then mr clay, then, to you, mr jordan, uh miss owens. Obviously this is a gang up on you. You know we we’re we’re giving uh these witnesses the ability to do a rebuttal on you and so um. You know i i find it unfair, miss blue, i mean you know candidly for you to show mutual respect and then you to go after miss owens. It’S not appropriate, so miss owens. You can have four minutes and 34 seconds to respond for a second i’ll yield. Thank you uh. I believe miss owens. When you used the word hilarious, it was in it was referencing the fact that no one had asked you a question. It wasn’t to the subject. Matter of the hearing is that right, that is correct and perhaps to have another witness insinuate, something that is not accurate is just not appropriate. Mr chairman, for how witnesses are supposed to behave in front of this committee, i also think you didn’t say it doesn’t matter about the subject matter of today’s hearing. You said there are other subjects that matter as well, and maybe we should spend some time on. Those is that accurate, that is correct and they matter much much much much more, and i have said that i said that in my opening – and i will say it again – you know that white, supremacy and white nationalism is nowhere near ranks nowhere near the top of The issues that are facing black america and the reason that you are bringing them up in this room is because it is attempt to make the election all about race. As the democrats, not in my case, please do not characterize my motive. Mr chairman, it’s my time. It’S my time. You’Ve got your time, mr meadows, i’ll, give you three more seconds every four years you bring up race and you knew exactly what i meant when i said hilarious and you just tried to do live what the media does all the time to republicans to our president And to conservatives, would you try to manipulate what i said to fit your narrative? Okay? I was not referring to the subject matter. That is hilarious. I said it’s hilarious, that we are sitting in this room today and i’ve got two doctors and a misses, and nobody can give us real numbers that we can respond to. So we can assess how big of a threat. This is because you know that it is not as big of a threat as you are trying to make it out to be so. You can manipulate and the audacity of you to bring up the christ church shooting manifesto and make it seem as if i laughed at people that were slaughtered by a homicidal media. Maniac is, in my opinion, absolutely despicable, and i think that we should be above that to try to assign reality or any meaning to a homicide. Homicidal maniac writing a manifesto which, by the way, let the record show also stated spyro the dragon, the child’s cartoon as a source of inspiration. He also cited nelson mandela as a source of information. I don’t think i don’t think that nelson mandela has inspired mosque shootings. You can correct me if you think i’m wrong, you would rather assign meaning to a homicidal maniac than to actually address that. I said to the things that i said today that are actually harming black america number one father absence number two: the education system and the literacy rate illegal immigration ranks high abortion ranks high white supremacy and white nationalism. If i had to make a list again of 100, things would not be on it. This hearing, in my opinion, is a farce, and it is ironic that you’re sitting here and you’re having three caucasian people testify and tell you what their expertise are. Do i know what my expertise are black in america? I’Ve been black in america, my whole life all 30 years, and i can tell you that you guys have done the exact same thing every four years ahead of an election cycle and it needs to stop i’ll i’ll yield back. Thank you, mr meadows. Thank you chairman for the opportunity to testify um. I just i want to testify just as a black american today, and i want to first start off by saying that white supremacy is indeed real, but despite the media’s, obsessive coverage of it, it represents an isolated, uncoordinated and fringe occurrence within america. It’S a fringe occurrence that is being used, in my opinion, by democrats to scare americans into giving up their votes to a party that can no longer win based on simple ideas, which is why we’re seeing so many of these hearings back to back. Despite other threats that are facing this nation, i want to reiterate that point: white supremacy is real, just as racism is real, but neither of these ideologies are real in this room. They have become mechanisms for the left to continue to call these hearings and to distract from much bigger issues that are facing this country and which threaten minorities. Much bigger issues that they are responsible for white nationalism sounds a lot better as a threat than father absence. When are we going to call a hearing on the 74 percent of single motherhood rate in black america today? My guess is probably never, since democrats are the author of that epidemic, which leaves us black americans 20 times more likely to end up in prison nine times more likely to drop out of high school and five times more likely to lead a life in poverty and To commit crime, white nationalism also sounds a lot better than illiteracy rates. I’M assuming we’re never going to call a hearing on that which is a real epidemic that is facing black americans and minority americans today, an epidemic which, by the way, has a lot closer of a tie to our nation’s history of white supremacy slave codes. In the early 19th century made it illegal for black americans to learn to read why? Because if slaves could read, they could access information. I don’t believe that much has changed on the most recent national assessment of educational progress. Just 17 percent of black students scored proficient in reading at a 12th grade level, 83 of blacks in america were not found proficient in reading at a 12th grade level. Are we going to have a hearing on that? Probably not white nationalism also sounds a lot better than abortion as a threat which has resulted in the slaughter of 18 million black americans since 1973, and points to a bigger crisis, which is the fact that the bloc black population growth has stagnated in this country. The crisis and in major cities like in new york, we have more black babies that are being aborted than born alive. If we’re talking about preserving lives and we’re talking about white supremacy, we should probably have a topic, a conversation about that. But today, in this room, we’re going to see democrats try to connect the dots to white supremacy and the internet. So the question is: why so that people, who have absolutely nothing to do with propagating white supremacy, are censored, silenced and controlled. What they are actually after is our permission to censor and silent and control any dissenting voices that go against the mainstream narrative that they wish to propagate, to give a glimpse into just how absurd and expansive the definition of white supremacy has become. I offer to the community that i have been libeled and smeared by democrat media cohorts as someone who supports white supremacy, you need but look at me to determine that that just isn’t true. Why? Because i routinely say black people don’t have to be democrats. I am now considered somebody that is radicalizing people on the internet. What a radical idea, black people waking up to the abuses and the democrat party uh, which has been indicated upon black america over the last 60 years. There have been sincere attempts just so everybody knows to censor me on social media, because i am radical youtube once censored me for criticizing black lives matter. They reverse the censorship and they apologize and they called it. A mistake. Facebook once censored me for calling out liberal supremacy as a threat facing black america. What i said specifically was that in any community, where liberal policies reign supreme, you will find that black america is hurting. I stand by that assessment. Facebook reversed my censorship, apologized and claimed. It was a mistake, of course, i’m fortunate that i have a big enough platform that when i get branded something extreme i can reverse it, but the majority of americans don’t have that platform. The majority of americans with dissenting dissenting opinions are silenced forever. Many words which have once held very serious meetings have come to take on a different definition over the last couple of years, as democrats have desperately tried to grapple with the fact that they are no longer able to manipulate americans with broad claims and broad strokes of Racism, sexism misogyny and the like words like racism, which today most nearly means anything or anyone that disagrees with the liberal and terms like white nationalism, which today and in this room and upon this floor, most nearly means that it’s election time, america, it’s time for the Left to do what they do best divide, distract and hope to keep their most important voting block to their party, which is black, americans, angry and emotional and reactive enough to keep voting for the same party that has systematically destroyed our families, sent our men to prison And deferred all of our dreams, i will close out by telling you that this is not going to work. America and, and more importantly, black america, is waking up to deploy the bad acting the folk concern these hearings. It’S not going to stop black america from breaking the change of victimhood, and it’s certainly not going to stop me from being one of the loudest voices against it. Thank you. Thank you. So much for your testimony.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.