Donald Trump and his associates should combat unjust anti-white racism.
Insisting that corporations and the government treat people fairly regardless of race is deemed poisonous and ridiculous by some.
An article on the Trump team’s plan to use civil-rights laws against DEI policies discriminating against whites has sparked criticism.
Critics have ridiculed the notion, with snarky comments suggesting that Trump is fighting for “white advantage.”
Warnings have been issued about Trumpism promoting the victimization of white Americans due to their race.
Many argue that anti-white racism does not exist while also asserting its importance in racial progress.
This was reminiscent of the debates during the CRT controversy, where critical race theory was either dismissed as a myth or viewed as a necessary tool for educating about America’s past.
The debate often leads to a rhetorical phenomenon where contradictory arguments are made simultaneously.
Despite the controversy, it is acknowledged that favoring one group in hiring, admissions, and contracting decisions can disadvantage others. This has been evident in affirmative-action policies at colleges.
Individuals should not be penalized for their race, as it goes against the law and is unfair.
The US Constitution and civil-rights laws are race-neutral and can be used to challenge the system of racial preferences that exist in American life.
Corporations that set hiring targets based on race and gender may face legal challenges and exposure.
Former Trump aide Stephen Miller’s America First Legal has been successful in challenging discriminatory practices, but a Trump Justice Department could expedite the end of these preferences.
There are indications that DEI initiatives in corporate America are waning under political and legal pressure.
If the Trump administration takes action against discriminatory policies in business and government, it may force the Left to confront the issue of anti-white discrimination more directly.
Twitter: @RichLowry
