Editorial: Readers react to Congress passing aid package for Ukraine

The House Passing Aid to Ukraine

Despite facing pressure from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and other far-right colleagues, Mike Johnson demonstrated courage by pushing through $60 billion in aid to support Ukraine’s war against Russia (“Nyet, Moscow Marjorie,” April 21).

Johnson attempted to link the national-security aid package to a border-security measure, but the opportunity had already passed when Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer allowed the GOP’s HR 2 bill to expire. He also rejected the Schumer-Lankford immigration bill, which he viewed as supporting Biden’s open-border policy.

It is unfortunate that Johnson did not voice concerns about Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s discussions about Ukraine joining NATO, a move that could escalate tensions and hinder peace negotiations.

James Hyland

Beechhurst

There is skepticism regarding providing further aid to Ukraine due to the country’s history of corruption at the highest levels. Many Republicans question the trustworthiness of Ukraine and worry about the efficacy of the aid package. The Biden administration believes that without this aid, Ukraine may lose the war by the end of the year.

If the $60 billion aid package is successful, will Ukraine achieve victory by the end of the year? If not, what additional demands might President Zelensky make from US taxpayers? Some believe aid to Ukraine should have ceased earlier, as it appears to be an ongoing investment with uncertain returns.

J. J. Crovatto

Ramsey, NJ

Mike Johnson’s leadership in passing aid to Ukraine offers hope for responsible leadership during this challenging time. Some suggest that a Liz Cheney-Mike Johnson ticket could be a viable option if former President Donald Trump does not run in the general election.

Joe Schwarz

Penticton, Canada

While aid to Ukraine is being prioritized, concerns are raised about neglecting the US border and accumulating more debt. The future appears uncertain as exponential debt continues to rise, with a lack of responsible leadership on this issue. The aid to Ukraine is a significant expenditure that may not yield commensurate results for US taxpayers.

Barry McIntyre

Calgary, Alberta

Last week, House Republicans and Democrats joined forces to pass aid to Ukraine with a decisive vote of 311-112, showcasing bipartisan cooperation. The outcome provides a glimmer of hope for unity in government.

Ron Spurga

Manhattan

Despite her imperfections, Marjorie Taylor Greene is commended for her prioritization of America’s interests and aversion to wasting taxpayer resources. Her statements often reflect a patriotic and America-first mindset, which some argue should be considered before passing judgement.

JR Cummings

Manhattan

Piers Morgan is praised for calling out Marjorie Taylor Greene’s controversial remarks, highlighting concerns about Speaker Mike Johnson’s approval of aid to Ukraine. Criticism is directed towards Johnson for supporting the aid package without clear accountability measures in place.

James Schwartz

Summit, NJ

If you want to share your thoughts on today’s topics, please email letters@nypost.com with your full name and city of residence. Please note that letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.