Harris’ ‘Opportunity Economy’ chipping away at federal control

Donald Trump, the former President, recently criticized Kamala Harris as a “one-woman economic wrecking ball,” a fitting description for her plans to establish an “Opportunity Economy.”

Her proposal to revolutionize American life operates under the assumption that politicians are well-intentioned, bureaucrats are competent, and there are no consequences for government handouts or failures.

During a speech in Pittsburgh and an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Harris advocated for socialist control over the private sector as a means to drive economic progress.

She vowed to undertake “bold, persistent experimentation” in the spirit of Franklin Roosevelt, without mentioning that FDR’s economic policies were closely modeled after Mussolini’s.

Harris promotes “equity” as equal outcomes, stating, “Some people need more so we all end up in the same place.” The specifics of who will receive more support and how much remain undisclosed.

In her Opportunity Economy, politicians will have the authority to allocate resources, akin to football referees constantly changing the rules. Criticism of this system will likely be met with accusations of undermining fairness or being out of touch with current societal norms.

Harris’ vision for an Opportunity Society is reminiscent of President Biden’s controversial student debt relief plans, which were struck down by the Supreme Court for overstepping legal boundaries.

Traditional American safeguards for individual rights may be disregarded to accommodate Harris’ ambitious agenda.

Her policies, aimed at maximizing public attention while minimizing adherence to the law, could be seen in the federal harassment of the Sheetz convenience store chain.

Harris’ proposed grants for first-time home buyers, despite reminiscent of policies that led to the 2008 housing crash, reflect her unyielding commitment to a government-centric economy.

Based on modern monetary theory, Harris believes government funding can solve all problems, overlooking the financial burden it places on future generations.

While Harris promises equity and social justice through her economic model, the potential negative impacts on prosperity are often disregarded. Her policies may not benefit the masses, but can always be rationalized as addressing climate change.

Instead of acknowledging the real-world challenges like business closures, educational setbacks from school closures, and inflation, Harris champions further federal intervention under the guise of achieving equity.

Unfortunately, the outcome of these policies may result in perpetual political conflicts, further impoverishing the nation.

James Bovard’s latest book is “Last Rights: The Death of American Liberty.”