Opinions

Israel emerges victorious in Gaza conflict, with clear strategy for post-war future


Andrew Fox was an officer in the British Army from 2005-21, retiring with the rank of Major. He completed three tours in Afghanistan, including one attached to U.S. Army Special Forces. He is a lecturer at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Here, in an essay for Tablet magazine, reprinted with permission by The Post, he explains what US officials don’t understand about Israel’s strategy in Gaza.

As the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) conducts another assault in the north of Gaza, they face significant criticism from Western officials and analysts who are asking why the IDF is repeatedly going into areas they have already cleared and conducting further operations.

Critics claim this behavior reflects a flaw in operational design, or is even proof that Israel’s campaign against Hamas has failed.

The flaw, however, lies in their own assumptions.

These critics are looking at IDF tactics through the lens of Western counterinsurgency (COIN), the doctrine that US and European militaries applied in the failed campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the “global war on terror,” Western tactics were to seize a chunk of territory and clear it of enemies through military force.

The plan was then to hold the territory through forward operating bases (or FOBs) and try to conduct alternative governance in those areas while providing security.

The system of FOBs meant that our enemies, embedded in the local civilian population, always knew where we were and what routes we were likely to use. They could mortar, rocket, and IED us at will.

It was a recipe for endless violence and huge numbers of casualties.

In the case of the 2023-24 Gaza war, Western critics have almost comically misunderstood what the Israeli military is trying to do.

The flaw in Western analysis is always the same: “We wouldn’t do it that way.”

Yet the IDF has absolutely no intention of using the clear-hold-build COIN tactics the West tried in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Why would it?


Map showing Gaza
Critics claim this behavior reflects a flaw in operational design, or is even proof that Israel’s campaign against Hamas has failed.

Those tactics were an unmitigated disaster in both campaigns, which ended in humiliating defeats at the hands of technologically inferior armies.

COIN tactics are time consuming and costly.

They also require huge troop levels to “hold” ground, for years if not indefinitely.

Assuming Western doctrinal ratios of 1 soldier to every 40 civilians, Gaza would require an enduring deployment of 50,000 combat troops, before we even consider enabling logistics, engineers, artillery and the like.

The economic costs of mobilizing the IDF’s reservist army on an enduring basis would be astronomical.



Source link

TruthUSA

I'm TruthUSA, the author behind TruthUSA News Hub located at https://truthusa.us/. With our One Story at a Time," my aim is to provide you with unbiased and comprehensive news coverage. I dive deep into the latest happenings in the US and global events, and bring you objective stories sourced from reputable sources. My goal is to keep you informed and enlightened, ensuring you have access to the truth. Stay tuned to TruthUSA News Hub to discover the reality behind the headlines and gain a well-rounded perspective on the world.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.