Kamala’s Broadway Word Salad: A Clear Indication That America Made the Right Choice in November
This past weekend, Kamala Harris enjoyed some Broadway performances.
And she highlighted how fortunate we are that she wasn’t elected.
She and her spouse, Doug Emhoff, interacted with the cast of “A Wonderful World: The Louis Armstrong Musical,” where she delivered a pep talk reminiscent of Damon Wayans’ character Oswald Bates from “In Living Color”—a character known for his verbose and nonsensical soliloquies.
In the footage, she fumbled through yet another incoherent speech filled with empty platitudes.
“When we consider these moments where we observe things being taken, but also let’s recognize that nature abhors a vacuum,” she conveyed to the performers.
“Where there’s a vacancy, let’s fill it. We must acknowledge that the reality is that our nation’s progress has been about the expansion of rights, not the restriction of rights.”
Huh?
As she spoke in convoluted phrases, her unruly hair fell across her face. With every absurd statement, her eyes bulged like E.T.’s and her chin retracted into her head, reflecting the expression of someone grappling with the works of Kendall Jackson.
“We must maintain clarity. And that does not preclude us from seeing the beauty in everything. These elements all coexist; however, I believe we fight for something, not against something,” she proceeded.
To consider that in an alternate universe, she could have been our president is jarring.
The timing of her appearance was especially poignant, as just days prior, our Vice President JD Vance was in Munich, delivering a vital and impactful speech concerning the dangers of rising censorship and uncontrolled mass migration.
Vance was addressing critically necessary topics, particularly after “60 Minutes” inadvertently reinforced his argument. The show aired a segment on Germany’s strategy to combat online “hate speech,” which detailed an early morning police raid on a man whose only offense was a post on social media.
It was alarming to witness three prosecutors gleefully seizing citizens’ phones as if they were overly eager hall monitors intent on infantilizing an entire society.
As Vice President, Vance is directly confronting the critical issues of our era—the uncomfortable truths that endanger Western civilization and European democracies.
And while I watched him make a considerable impact with his significant speech, my thoughts drifted back to Harris. Despite being on the national stage for almost a decade, I still know little about her political beliefs. The only distinct notions she expressed were far-left ideas during ‘the great awokening.’
Her pivot toward the center during the election was communicated by her spokespeople and never thoroughly examined by the media. With the exception of Brett Baier, she was never rigorously pressed to clarify her positions. Even “60 Minutes” had to heavily edit her interview to produce semi-coherent responses.
Her only frequently cited sentiment appears to be that she firmly believes Americans possess hopes and dreams; they have aspirations.
Her appearance at the show, though casual, reinforced my belief that our nation made the right choice.
The contrast between her and Vance—and yes, Trump—could not be more pronounced. Her intellectual contributions are remarkably weak in comparison.
Not only was Harris unsuitable for this period in history, but she also lacks the capability for this role. She often appeared over her head in various respects.
She did, however, indicate that she would not “go quietly into the night” if she were to lose in November.
However, if the Democrats lack the foresight to “unburden” themselves from the past and remove her from their ranks, they won’t succeed for quite some time. And they don’t deserve success either.
