Letters on Trump’s ICE Deportation Policies
The Dilemma: Deportations under the Trump administration persist in New York City and across the nation.
It’s fascinating how progressive politicians are now expressing concern for illegal immigrants in New York City (“Progressives criticize Adams amid crackdown,” Jan. 29).
City Councilman Shaun Abreu has denounced the actions of ICE, stating that “fear is spreading,” yet where was his outcry when law-abiding residents were concerned about crimes committed by these “guests”?
As ICE takes action against criminals, it might be time for city voters to reconsider politicians who place the interests of illegal immigrants above those of law-abiding citizens. Leaders should prioritize the safety and rights of taxpayers, rather than merely the welfare of those residing here unlawfully. If Abreu is so compassionate, perhaps he should accompany his constituents as they leave.
Tim Stinson
Holbrook, Mass.
President Trump’s administration, at the start of its term, launched a strategy to tackle the issues surrounding illegal immigration.
The deportation initiatives executed by federal agents have garnered support from numerous residents for compelling reasons. The influx of violent criminals entering our country unvetted by the Biden administration has been alarming.
Denis David
Queens
Estranged from reason, the extreme left is now worried about the “fear” illegal immigrants are feeling due to the ICE raids.
Where was this concern for the past four years regarding the actual citizens they claim to represent, as illegal-immigrant crime plagued communities with violence and destruction of lives across the country?
This constant leftist outcry is yet another example of their hypocrisy and delusion.
James McCaffrey
Yonkers
If Governor Ned Lamont has declared Connecticut a welcoming state for all immigrants, why not take him up on his proposition (“Plans to send 30K to Gitmo,” Jan. 30)?
Rather than spending millions on deportations or accommodating people in facilities like Guantanamo, relocating them to a state that welcomes them could provide a more economical solution. This would fulfill his pledge while saving taxpayer money.
Walter Goldeski
East Brunswick, NJ
The Dilemma: Catholic bishops criticizing the Trump administration’s measures against illegal immigration.
As a lifelong Roman Catholic, I have often pondered the church’s political stance in the United States, especially regarding its attitude toward conservatives (“J.D. criticizes bishops: ‘Do better,’ ” Jan. 27).
The separation of church and state is essential. This was particularly clear during President Trump’s first term when the pope declined to meet with then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is a Christian.
I am against Catholic and other NGOs that thrive by aiding those who enter this country illegally while opposing law enforcement. Are their actions driven by humanitarian motives, or are they influenced by the millions they receive?
Thank you, Vice President J.D. Vance, for scrutinizing their motivations.
Joann Mirone
Old Greenwich, Conn.
I don’t grasp why Catholic bishops criticized President Trump’s border policies. Equally puzzling is how, when former President Joe Biden met Pope Francis, he asserted that the pope called him a “good Catholic”—yet the pope never verified this. How can a ‘good Catholic’ support abortion?
It appears the church is becoming partisan on political issues when it should maintain neutrality.
Charlie Yannelli
Barnegat, NJ
Want to share your thoughts on today’s stories? Send your opinions (with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
