Media lapdogs run into reality with JD Vance’s strong immigration stance and criticism of Kamala Harris

Kudos to GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance for his recent strong confrontation with biased Democratic journalists regarding the Harris-Biden border crisis. 

First on the list?

His interview with the New York Times’ Lulu Garcia-Navarro, known for her arrogance and liberal bias.

Garcia-Navarro acted smug and superior throughout the conversation until she tried to catch Vance off guard.

Vance has correctly pointed out the US housing shortage as a factor in rising home prices; Garcia-Navarro suggested that cracking down on illegal immigration would harm the construction industry and worsen the housing shortage.

Vance countered by pointing out that in the 1950s and ’60s, the US managed to build new homes without a large influx of illegal immigrants — and added that the jobs created by a housing construction boom should be given to the 7 million working-age American men who have given up looking for work.

Once again, Garcia-Navarro made a smug comment about low unemployment rates; once again, Vance shut her down by noting that the unemployment rate doesn’t account for the millions of people who have dropped out of the labor force.

Garcia-Navarro seemed unaware of this fact and was left in stunned silence.

Even more concerning were the insensitive remarks of ABC’s Martha Raddatz.

Raddatz, acting like a biased reporter, claimed that the activities of Venezuela’s violent Tren de Aragua gang in Aurora, Colo., were limited to a few apartment complexes.

Vance made it clear: “Martha, are you listening to yourself? Only a few apartment complexes in America have been taken over by Venezuelan gangs, and you think Donald Trump is the issue, not Kamala Harris’ open border policy?”

Raddatz had no substantial response because there is no valid argument against Vance’s points. 

It’s not good news for Harris that these journalists are being confronted with reality — but it’s great news for America.