MTA Introduces Fare Inspectors to Buses, Letters
The Problem: MTA’s decision to introduce fare checkers on buses to tackle fare evasion issues.
The plan by the MTA to employ fare inspectors on buses is reminiscent of former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s violence interrupters (“MTA is getting fare-beaten up,” Aug. 27).
I hope these inspectors have adequate medical coverage, as they are likely to face challenging situations.
Some of the fare-beaters are known to be aggressive, similar to those who engage in altercations on the subway over minor issues.
Being a fare inspector seems like an incredibly difficult job.
Robert Mangi
Garden City
In the 1950s, my grandfather worked as a fare collector on the Detroit Street Railroad.
Each bus had two staff members, a driver, and a fare collector.
Passengers entered through the back door (where the fare collector was stationed) and exited through the front door.
It appears that hiring a fare collector for every NYC bus is a costly approach that may not be the most efficient.
A better alternative could be to halt the bus and involve law enforcement to arrest fare evaders if they refuse to pay.
This could address the revenue loss issue effectively.
Dick Vale
Schenectady
To prevent bus riders from boarding through the back door, implementing turnstiles could be a solution to prevent fare evasion.
Additionally, addressing false overtime pay concerns, which cost the MTA millions, is crucial.
Bunny Abraham
Manhattan
This year marks the 55th anniversary of discontinuing giving change for cash fare by NYC bus drivers.
This change enhanced safety for all, as drivers were previously at risk of robbery while on duty.
Switching focus to driving rather than handling cash improved efficiency.
Despite the recent fare increase, the OMNY card remains a cost-effective option, and riders should comply with paying the fare.
Larry Penner
Great Neck
Suggesting that revenue from congestion pricing should subsidize the MTA while fare evasion is rampant seems illogical.
Thomas Urban
Wantagh
The Problem: Former President Donald Trump’s controversial visit to Arlington Cemetery this week.
Miranda Devine provided a thorough analysis of the Afghanistan withdrawal under President Biden’s leadership (“Callous Joe’s military horror,” Aug. 29).
The suicide bombing that claimed 13 American lives and injured many others should not be attributed to former President Donald Trump.
Americans should vote based on the good of the country, not personal animosity towards an individual.
Chelli Nobile
East Islip
In response to Devine’s column about Trump’s tribute at Arlington National Cemetery for Gold Star families: It’s easy to forget Trump’s derogatory remarks about veterans.
Reports claim that Trump referred to fallen soldiers as “losers and suckers” because they gained nothing from it.
He allegedly didn’t want wounded veterans in his parades due to their appearance.
This visit was more of a public relations stunt than a genuine display of empathy: Bringing a videographer and photographer against regulations was telling.
We must see through the facade and recognize the truth.
Frank Russo
Centereach
Share your thoughts on today’s topics by sending an email to letters@nypost.com with your full name and city of residence. Your letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
