Team Joe’s Role in the Big Lie: Unveiling the Truth About the Biden Family

Since The Post revealed the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020, it has become clear that Joe Biden was entangled in his son’s influence peddling activities.

The president’s repeated denials hold as much weight as Bill Clinton’s assertion that “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”

One of Biden’s most far-fetched claims was that he never engaged in discussions with Hunter regarding his foreign business dealings.

Communications and images from the laptop revealing Joe meeting with Hunter’s dubious clients contradict this assertion.

Furthermore, the disclosures surrounding Hunter receiving millions from the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, despite lacking expertise in either energy or Ukraine, debunk the narrative of a merit-based enterprise.

This narrative was further supported by public statements made by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, who valiantly confirmed the authenticity of various emails and named Joe as the “big guy” anticipated to receive a 10% share in a Chinese partnership.

At the center of this extensive deception is the 2013 trip to China, during which Hunter accompanied his vice-presidential father on Air Force Two and returned with a considerable investment from a Chinese bank.

We are led to believe that the father never inquired, “Hey, what are you doing on my plane and why are you headed to China?”

For those still clinging to Biden’s ludicrous denials, the images from that journey decisively settle the matter.

Withheld by Archives

However, the release of these images serves a dual purpose: it not only exposes the president as a liar but also reveals the National Archives’ choice to withhold evidence until after the election, despite a lawsuit from America First Legal, hinting at a more extensive scandal.

This indicates that the president may have coerced others in the administration into hiding his deception.

Think of it as a unified governmental effort to aid Biden in securing a second term.

Did Attorney General Merrick Garland have knowledge of what the National Archives was concealing?

Was Vice President Kamala Harris aware?

How could they possibly not know?

Information alone would have circulated the scandalous details from one administration to the next, compounded by the necessity to log every encounter a vice president has with foreign leaders during an official visit.

The Secret Service would be informed of the roles of all those traveling with the vice president and their engagements.

And who doubts that the CIA, FBI, and other elements of the deep state were aware of Biden’s disingenuous statements?

This knowledge constitutes a level of blackmail, ample enough to keep him compliant.

Historically, J. Edgar Hoover instilled fear in presidents and key congressional members with far less incriminating evidence.

The crux is that many within the Obama administration were likely aware that Biden was introducing his troubled son to top officials and bankers in a communist nation.

What did Blinken know?

Antony Blinken, now serving as Biden’s Secretary of State, was also involved in arranging the misleading 2020 letter from 51 former intelligence officials claiming the laptop was an indicator of Russian disinformation. He undoubtedly possessed knowledge regarding the Biden family’s business dealings.

As deputy national security adviser in 2013, he should have been privy to this information.

Jake Sullivan, currently Biden’s national security adviser, must have been aware that his superior was lying to the public as well.

Sullivan was present on the China trip and later conceded that Hunter’s business ties were “not something that was on any of our radar screens.”

Even though Biden will soon be exiting office, this history cannot merely be brushed aside.

Too many questions remain unanswered.

It’s noteworthy that Bobulinski previously stated he had reconsidered his view regarding the Biden relationship with China.

Initially, he believed it was mostly about businesses seeking favor with the vice president, but he came to suspect that Chinese intelligence had extensively funded the Biden family as part of a scheme to compromise Joe.

As we gather more information, this perspective increasingly seems plausible.

Thus, these photographs cannot be the concluding chapter of this narrative.

GOP’s probe options

There are two potential courses of action moving forward.

First, Republicans should leverage their congressional majorities to establish a joint investigative committee and collaborate with the incoming Trump administration to unearth all government documents related to the Biden family’s connections.

Although Rep. James Comer and other GOP House members made significant strides during the previous term, they will now benefit from a GOP majority in the Senate and, most importantly, Trump in the White House.

The second approach could involve Trump discussing with Pam Bondi, his likely attorney general, the possibility of appointing a special counsel to investigate whether Joe Biden was compromised by his family’s dealings and who within the administration aided in obscuring this information from Comer and the public.

Bondi’s primary goal should be to uncover whether the substantial funds received by the Bidens influenced America’s policies toward China, Ukraine, and other nations where the family conducted business.

In response to such actions, Democrats and their media allies will likely shout that Trump is weaponizing government against his political adversaries.

Let them complain.

Biden set that precedent by prompting Garland to target Trump, leading to two separate federal indictments against him, an unprecedented move against any former president.

Luckily, both cases are now defunct, but had Trump lost, he would have been bracing for trial and possible imprisonment.

When it comes to Biden, there is no doubt he acted unethically by facilitating his family’s financial gains based on his influential roles.

It is not vengeance to ascertain whether he personally accepted bribes and betrayed America’s interests to foreign adversaries.

This aligns with the rationale Democrats and the media used in accusing Trump of colluding with Russia.

In that scenario, the allegations were baseless, but we already possess substantial evidence indicating Biden engaged in actions far more severe than anything Trump was ever accused of committing.

In this instance, the full truth is crucial for our national security. It must be revealed.