The Impact of Trump Tariffs on the Stock Market

The Concern: Stock market reactions to President Trump’s fluctuating trade policies.

What’s happening with the stock market? (“Markets plunge as Trump takes economy on wild ride,” March 11)

Many are experiencing losses in their IRAs and bank accounts.

President Trump appears to be acting erratically, leading to a negative response from the markets regarding his tariff management.

His strategies are causing the United States to distance itself from global partners.

Where are the safeguards established by our Founding Fathers to mitigate such radical policies?

Martin Blumberg

Melville

In the “Age of Ozempic,” a desire for instant solutions prevails.

Americans often dismiss traditional methods of dieting and exercise; this sentiment mirrors our approach to economic issues.

A comprehensive reset will require both pain and sacrifice.

It may be a turbulent process, but a more streamlined America will ultimately enhance our strength and competitiveness.

Ronald G. Frank

West Orange, NJ

My retirement portfolio is suffering, and since Trump’s return to his erratic management style, the market has taken a beating.

What was once a promise of significant gains now feels like disinformation, while the truth has become alarming.

Action must be taken to address the shrinking stock market.

My stress levels are soaring just as my investments plummet.

Dennis Fitzgerald

Melbourne, Australia

The stock market has been overhyped for at least a year, making this correction foreseeable.

The implications of Trump’s tariffs and a potential trade conflict have brought this issue to the forefront.

The president is balancing precariously, and it often appears he’s doing so without proper support.

If he’s truly navigating this blindly, both he and the economy are at risk of a collapse.

Paul Bloustein

Cincinnati, Ohio

President Trump is wreaking havoc on the economy, and our nation is in dire need of repair.

Americans are still trapped in China and Russia, protests rage on college campuses, and Mexico continues to evade its wall-building responsibilities.

School meals are being cut for children, Medicaid and Medicare are facing reductions, while Elon Musk dismantles federal programs.

When we voters expressed a desire for reductions, we meant food costs, not the stock market.

When we sought increases, we were not referring to rising unemployment rates.

Edward Drossman

Manhattan

The Concern: New York taxpayers footing approximately $60 million for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s legal fees.

It’s outrageous that New York has allowed former Gov. Andrew Cuomo to charge taxpayers $60 million for his legal defense against sexual harassment claims, according to the state comptroller (“Cuomo’s ‘fee’ for all NY,” March 10).

How many other officials have tapped into taxpayer funds to defend against personal misconduct allegations?

The Legislature must amend the law to ensure the public isn’t burdened with legal costs associated with alleged personal misdeeds.

These funds could have been used for additional police funding, child care, and essential services.

Paul Feiner

Greenburgh

Gov. Cuomo isn’t shy about expressing his views — but they rarely reflect the truth.

He genuinely seems to believe that New York should cover the costs tied to his conduct.

Any affection Cuomo has for this city is overshadowed by his self-interest.

He does not merit a second chance.

Peter Cooper

Bronxville

Want to share your thoughts on today’s news? Send your feedback (along with your full name and city) to letters@nypost.com. Please note that letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.