Tim Walz exemplifies the caution surrounding Kamala Harris’ decision-making
Recent events have added to Tim Walz’s embarrassment as he faced off against Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a game of “Madden” and ended in a 0-0 tie, despite being referred to as a “championship high-school football coach.” It should be noted that he was only a volunteer assistant coach due to his DUI record preventing him from being a paid coach.
Last week, Walz made a comment about Elon Musk, criticizing his behavior during a rally with Obama in Wisconsin. It seems that he is not pleased with the attention Musk brings to the Trump campaign.
In another incident, Walz criticized J.D. Vance for his time as a venture capitalist, despite admitting he does not understand what venture capitalists do.
These incidents do not paint a flattering picture for someone aspiring to be next in line for the presidency.
His actions, such as struggling to load a shotgun at a hunting event, lying about his National Guard rank, and his poor performance in the VP debate against Vance, raise questions about his suitability for a higher office.
These issues are particularly concerning as Kamala Harris selected him as her running mate, a decision that has been met with criticism given other viable options available, like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro.
The choice of Walz as her running mate has led to challenges in key states like Pennsylvania and Minnesota, possibly due to reasons beyond just political strategy.
Tim Walz’s actions serve as a warning sign about Kamala Harris’ decision-making abilities and the implications of her choices for the Democratic party.
