Trans Inclusion Leads to All-Male Finals: Examining the Hypocrisy of the Left and Other Insights

Woke watch: ‘Trans’ Inclusion = All-Male Finals

An “all-male final” in a “women’s pool championship”? This is “the endgame of trans ideology,” critics like Lauren Smith at Spiked argue.

In the recent “Ultimate Pool Women’s Pro Series” final, the match featured Harriet Haynes and Lucy Smith, both of whom are biological men.

While it might be true that “in pool, the differences between men and women may not be as stark” as they are in sports like swimming, “men still have inherent biological advantages,” evident to anyone who observes (such as having longer arms).

This situation indicates that top female players are expected to disregard their years of training and dedication simply to protect men’s feelings.

Women “deserve to witness two genuine women competing for a women’s championship. The only balls that should be involved here are the ones on the table.”

Protest desk: The Hands-off Hypocrite Left

“Hands off?” Protests against Donald Trump and Elon Musk are ironically calling for “the government to meddle — squeezing our freedoms and pilfering our wallets,” declares the Issues & Insights Editorial Board.

The true “hands-on weapons of autocrats and dictators” are “waste, fraud, excessive regulations, and politicized law enforcement.”

The question remains: “How is Donald Trump consolidating power by reducing government size, eliminating waste, and deregulating the economy?”

Contrary to the protestor’s narrative, he “is not against immigrants; instead, he aims to curb illegal immigration and deport those residing here illegally.”

No wonder many protesters were unaware of what they were actually protesting.

Indeed, “these protests reveal that the left has little to offer — only fear.”

From the right: Why the Young Won’t Work

“President Trump insists his tariffs will” create manufacturing jobs, but “good luck finding employees to fill those roles,” observes Allysia Finley from The Wall Street Journal.

Employers report that “they struggle to find reliable and responsible workers capable of passing a drug test.”

Federal statistics indicate that “the worker shortage in America is the worst it has been in 50 years.” This issue stems from government policies that provide benefits to able-bodied individuals who opt not to work, as well as subsidizing college degrees that fail to lead to gainful employment.

Young individuals have been led to believe that capitalism is exploitative and therefore refrain from factory jobs, preferring instead to rely on taxpayers or their parents.

Caution: “The falling employment rates among young men pose a far more significant threat to the nation’s economic and cultural vitality than the loss of manufacturing jobs.” Tariffs alone cannot solve this dilemma.

Conservative: Fed Waste Is Big Biz

“Taxpayer exploitation is one of the largest enterprises in America,” complains Stephen Moore at The Washington Times.

“It funds the system, and everyone in the swamp gets their share.” Elon Musk’s DOGE has revealed “$10 billion spent on rent for unoccupied office spaces” and “hundreds of millions allocated for foreign aid programs that “vanished without a trace.”

Democrats “have not lifted a finger” to eliminate “the rampant fraud and corruption.”

“Nor have Republicans, over the years. Washington has hidden behind a facade of plausible deniability while audits and inspector general reports have unveiled the ongoing plunder of taxpayer funds.”

“The most chilling and evident reason” that politicians “failed to intervene” is because “THEY ARE COMPLICIT.”

Science beat: Bad Data Everywhere

A 2020 study asserting that “black babies are three times more likely to die when treated by a white doctor compared to a black one” has been deemed “junk science,” proclaims Beckett Adams at The Hill, with evidence showing that its data was “manipulated to create a divisive and partisan narrative.”

The creators of this “dishonest study” ignored scientific rigor to promote their “narrative” — and more alarmingly, “they seem to have intentionally hidden data that could have undermined” their misleading claims.

“What is even more alarming than this study’s transition from junk to accepted fact is that similar incidents are not isolated.”

As journalists and scientific bodies become “more susceptible to flawed studies,” how can the public be sure they aren’t being misled — either intentionally or inadvertently?

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board