Trump supports America, Harris supports Iran and China

Amidst growing alignment of America’s enemies in an anti-democratic axis, the 2024 election presents a clear choice: Only Donald Trump offers a robust foreign policy that prioritizes US interests. 

One of the chief falsehoods of the Kamala Harris campaign is the attempt to obscure her involvement in past 3½ years of foreign policy failures. A quick review of the disastrous foreign policy decisions she has been part of sheds light on why the Harris camp is trying to downplay her role. 

Let’s begin with Iran: Since the start of the administration, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have consistently bent over backwards to appease the Iranian regime.

They were eager to bring Iran back into a revamped version of the failed Obama-era nuclear deal.

Despite Iran’s hostile actions towards US interests and allies in the Middle East, the Biden-Harris administration offered numerous incentives, including significant sanctions relief and cash payments. 

While Iran continued its aggressive tactics, Harris echoed anti-Israel sentiments, even going as far as suggesting Israel was committing genocide. 

Her foreign policy advisers leaned towards appeasing Iran, and her VP pick was made with political calculations rather than national interests in mind. 

On the other hand, Donald Trump understood the threat Iran posed and took decisive actions, imposing sanctions, withdrawing from the nuclear deal, and eliminating key Iranian military figures. 

His approach led to stability in the region and historic peace agreements. 

Turning to China, the Biden-Harris administration displayed weakness in dealing with Beijing’s provocations. 

China’s aggressive actions went unchecked, with no substantial pushback from Harris or Biden. 

Under a Harris presidency, it is likely that China would continue to be appeased. 

In contrast, Trump has a long-standing focus on China’s threat and has shown willingness to confront them economically and militarily. 

His actions demonstrate a clear understanding of who our allies and enemies are. 

As the nation faces challenges from China, Iran, and other adversaries, the choice in the upcoming election is crucial for shaping US foreign policy. 

It’s essential to recognize the changing alliances outside the liberal order and the need for a strong stance in defense of US interests. 

Harris’s track record indicates a propensity to appease rather than confront, posing a danger to national security. The decision is clear.