A recent study conducted on a cat colony in Brooklyn revealed that the cats relied on local garbage as a food source rather than hunting prey. However, it is important to consider the historical context and the impact of human destruction before blaming cats for ecological issues. Australian Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek is proposing legislation to address the supposed damage caused by cats, claiming that they have contributed to the extinction of two species in Australia. However, experts argue that human activities such as habitat loss, pollution, and vehicle collisions have a much more detrimental effect on wildlife. Studies have shown that feral cats primarily hunt rodents and, if they do catch birds, it is typically the weak and sickly ones. This does not significantly harm bird populations compared to human destruction. Furthermore, the claim that feral cats kill up to two billion animals per year lacks evidence. Recent research conducted by the University of New South Wales suggests that feral cats can have a positive impact on native prey species by promoting their ability to tolerate introduced predators. It is important to let nature take its course, as evidenced by another UNSW study that highlights the role of dingoes in controlling feral cats and conserving Australian ecosystems. Cats have been a part of human society for thousands of years, with ancient Egyptians even worshipping them. Unfortunately, during the Middle Ages, cats were persecuted due to their association with witchcraft and Satanism, resulting in the spread of the Black Death. Instead of resorting to inhumane methods like poison, the government should support community cat groups that trap, neuter, and release cats, rather than sending them to shelters where they are often killed. By taking these measures, we can avoid a situation where Australia becomes overrun by rats and eventually implement laws to protect cats instead of harming them.