US News

Appeals Court Suspends Judge’s Ruling Demanding Musk to Submit DOGE Records


A federal appeals court has intervened to block a prior court order requiring Elon Musk to provide documents related to the government’s downsizing initiatives linked to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

A federal appeals court has placed a hold on a discovery order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan that mandated Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to submit documents and address inquiries concerning their involvement in federal budget cuts.

On March 26, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an emergency stay of Chutkan’s order from March 12, which had mainly allowed expedited discovery to a coalition of 13 Democratic-led states. This order demanded that Musk and DOGE provide documentation and answers within 21 days.

The appeals court determined that Musk and DOGE met the stringent criteria needed for a stay and demonstrated a strong likelihood of success in their argument that the lower court should resolve their dismissal motion before proceeding with discovery.

“In particular, petitioners have shown a probability of success on their claim that the district court was obliged to decide their motion to dismiss before permitting discovery,” the three-judge panel noted in its decision.
In light of the appellate ruling, Chutkan issued a minute order acknowledging the appeal’s outcome, subsequently canceling a status hearing that was originally set for March 27.

This case, brought forth by New Mexico and a coalition of 12 Democrat-led states, contests the legality of DOGE’s extensive cost-cutting measures, which include the cancellation of federal grants and the mass termination of government employees deemed unnecessary by DOGE.

The plaintiffs claimed in their initial complaint that Musk is effectively operating DOGE without Senate confirmation, allegedly violating the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

“Unaware of the threat this poses to the nation, President Trump has granted Mr. Musk virtually unchecked authority without proper legal authorization from Congress, leading to a chaotic scenario in violation of the separation of powers,” the plaintiffs alleged. “This has transformed a minor role responsible for managing government websites into a position of overwhelming power without limits.”

In a later request for a temporary restraining order against Musk and DOGE, the states further accused Musk of unlawfully wielding immense executive power devoid of Senate confirmation, directing federal agencies to terminate employees, cancel contracts, dismantle programs, and access private government data.

In defense, government attorneys contended that the court should dismiss the emergency motion, arguing that the states did not demonstrate any imminent or irreparable damage. They insisted that the requested restraining order was excessively broad, lacked legal foundation, and was disconnected from the fundamental constitutional arguments raised by the plaintiffs. They also stated that Musk could not act without presidential approval, even if he were improperly appointed.

On March 12, Chutkan partially sided with the Democrat-led states, ordering Musk, DOGE, and associated entities to submit documents related to the termination of federal workers and modifications to government databases. She also demanded that DOGE identify all individuals who have led or worked at the agency since Trump took office and list all agencies where DOGE or Musk have canceled contracts, reduced grants, or terminated employees.
Both Trump and Musk have stated that DOGE has been aiding several agencies in terminating or offering buyouts to tens of thousands of federal employees since Trump resumed presidency on January 20, 2025.

Musk, serving as a special government employee, has been appointed by Trump to lead DOGE, aiming to fulfill the latter’s campaign promise of reducing waste, streamlining federal operations, and cutting bureaucratic red tape.

The DOGE team has swiftly acted to audit and implement reforms across federal agencies, reporting $130 billion in savings through the cancellation of grants, asset sales, layoffs, and terminated contracts and leases.

Critics of DOGE claim that its actions raise significant security and oversight concerns and have initiated multiple lawsuits challenging its operations.

Musk recently disclosed that the DOGE team is faced with daily death threats.

“The DOGE team receives death threats on a daily basis,” Musk stated during a March 24 White House cabinet meeting. “They are simply striving to do the right thing for the American taxpayer and the American population.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.