Chief Justice Roberts Warns of Threats to Judicial Independence
Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the necessity for the other branches of government to enforce court decisions when the executive branch fails to do so, in order to safeguard the rule of law, according to a recent report.
On December 31, Roberts highlighted that the federal judiciary is confronted with increasing challenges, including violent threats against judges, disinformation campaigns, and calls from elected officials to disregard judicial rulings.
Roberts noted that “violence, intimidation, disinformation, and threats to defy lawful judgments” endanger “the independence of judges, which is essential for upholding the rule of law.”
While elected officials are entitled to critique judicial decisions, their comments can lead to “dangerous reactions by others,” he stated.
He acknowledged that while “some tension between the branches of government is inevitable, and criticism of judicial interpretations of laws is as traditional as the Republic itself,” certain elected officials have “evoked the specter of openly ignoring federal court rulings.”
Related Stories
“Inappropriate attempts to intimidate judges regarding their rulings must be strongly resisted,” he affirmed.
Roberts stated that when executive officials neglect to enforce court decisions, it becomes essential for other governmental branches to intervene to uphold judicial independence and the rule of law.
He cited the example of the Supreme Court’s mandate for the desegregation of public schools in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), where the federal executive branch acted to implement the ruling despite opposition from various state officials.
“It is not inherent in judicial work to please everyone,” he remarked.
Roberts observed that judges’ decisions “have influenced the Nation’s evolution and kept the other branches in check,” although he noted that not all critiques of judicial decisions in recent years have been constructive.
He reported that the U.S. Marshals Service revealed that “hostile threats and communications directed at judges have more than tripled over the past decade.” In the last five years alone, the agency has looked into over “1,000 serious threats against federal judges,” leading to charges against approximately 50 individuals.
During the years 1979 to 1989, two federal district judges and one federal circuit judge were murdered while performing their judicial duties. Furthermore, relatives of federal judges were killed in 2005 and 2020 by individuals seeking to retaliate against the judges overseeing their cases. In 2022 and 2023, state judges in Maryland and Wisconsin were also killed following unfavorable rulings, he detailed.
Judges are also forced to guard against disinformation, which the report states “endangers judicial independence.” Courts are ill-equipped to tackle this issue since “judges usually communicate solely through their rulings.”
Moreover, hostile foreign governments have intensified their assaults on the federal government, including on judges, employing hacking and disseminating falsehoods that misrepresent court decisions “with fabricated or exaggerated narratives aimed at sowing discord within our democracy.”
Roberts concluded that due to the ways “these actors distort our judicial system, undermining public confidence in our processes and outcomes, we, as a Nation, must raise awareness of the risks and take necessary actions to combat them.”
