US News

Court Rejects Appeal to Lift Order Preventing DOGE from Social Security


The legal matter involving unions and advocacy organizations challenging DOGE’s ability to access Social Security databases is set to move forward in district court.

An appeals court this week rejected the Trump administration’s appeal against a lower court ruling that prevented the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing Social Security data.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the government’s appeal, asserting that the government did not possess the jurisdiction required to proceed. Consequently, the case will continue in a district court.

“Upon evaluating the arguments presented, this appeal is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction,” stated the brief order.

A concurring opinion from an appeals court judge was included, indicating: “In resolving the pending motion for a preliminary injunction, the involved parties must provide specific details to support their arguments. Generalized assertions are unlikely to satisfy the necessary burdens of proof.”

“Moreover, I urge the district court to act promptly and without delay in issuing its opinion on the preliminary injunction motion, while also permitting the introduction of pertinent evidence.”

On March 20, U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland ruled against DOGE’s access to Social Security databases containing personally identifiable information of Americans, pointing out that DOGE may be searching for fraudulent activity that does not exist. Her order mandated that DOGE eliminate any data it may have retrieved from the Social Security systems.

The plaintiffs in this case include unions and advocacy organizations such as the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME); the Alliance for Retired Americans (ARA); and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Democracy Forward, a legal group self-identified as left-leaning, assisted in initiating the lawsuit.
“We are pleased that the 4th Circuit has allowed this significant case to proceed in district court,” stated Richard Fiesta, head of the Alliance for Retired Americans, in a statement issued by Democracy Forward. “Every American retiree deserves the assurance that the Social Security Administration will safeguard their most sensitive and personal information from unwarranted disclosure.”
In their complaint submitted last month, plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against DOGE, the Social Security Administration, DOGE head Elon Musk, acting Social Security head Lee Dudek, and others, arguing that DOGE’s access to these systems could breach federal privacy laws and constitute government overreach.

“The American public… faces Executive Branch overreach that threatens the privacy of millions of individuals’ personal data,” the lawsuit asserts. “By attempting to seize and maintain access to agency systems, including that of the SSA (Social Security Administration), the Trump administration violates the protections that Congress and the Executive Branch have established against this type of data mining and misuse.”

The Trump administration filed an appeal regarding Hollander’s order on March 31, claiming that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate they suffered “irreparable harm from the SSA’s intra-agency disclosure of information, as employees viewing that information are bound by the same confidentiality obligations applicable to other similarly situated agency employees, as established by other courts addressing similar cases.”

Following Hollander’s order, Dudek, the acting SSA commissioner, suggested in media interviews that he might need to “shut down the agency” because her order “applies to nearly all SSA employees,” which prompted a letter from the judge clarifying that her order applies solely to DOGE employees interacting with his agency.

In a statement to clarify his remarks, Dudek responded on March 21, asserting that the agency would not be shutting down.

He confirmed, “I am not shutting down the agency,” adding that President Donald Trump “supports keeping Social Security offices operational and ensuring the right checks are delivered to the right individuals at the right time.” He further indicated that employees at the agency will carry on with their duties while the lawsuit is adjudicated in the courts.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.