DOJ Seeks to Block Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s $14 Billion Acquisition of Competitor
The Justice Department is aiming to prevent HPE from acquiring Juniper Networks, citing concerns over diminished competition and increased consumer prices.
The lawsuit, lodged in the Northern District of California, claims that this merger would merge two of the three leading wireless local area network (WLAN) technology providers in the country, which could negatively impact businesses, educational institutions, and healthcare organizations relying on high-performance networks.
The filing specifies that both HPE and Juniper are prominent players in enterprise-grade WLAN solutions, with HPE holding the second-largest market share and Juniper the third, as stated by the DOJ.
The DOJ highlighted that consolidating from three main suppliers to two—HPE and the industry’s frontrunner, Cisco—would lessen consumer options and may drive up prices for a significant number of American businesses.
“The risks posed by this merger are not hypothetical. Essential sectors in our nation—including U.S. hospitals and small enterprises—depend on wireless networks to fulfill their essential functions,” explained acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed A. Assefi.
He further emphasized that the proposed merger could “substantially reduce competition and hamper innovation, leading to significant segments of the American economy enduring higher costs and diminished services from wireless technology providers.”
Related Stories
The DOJ argues that Juniper has become a significant disruptor within the industry through its innovations, particularly in advanced artificial intelligence operations.
The lawsuit mentions internal communications from HPE that highlight a fierce competition with Juniper for major accounts.
It contends that such competitiveness benefits institutions by lowering prices and enhancing product functionalities.
Without Juniper acting as an independent competitor, the DOJ claims that organizations ranging from large hospitals to prominent universities could face fewer WLAN options and inflated costs. Officials warn that this could facilitate remaining market leaders in coordinating less favorable terms and slowing the overall innovation rate.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise, based in Texas, conducts its wireless networking operations out of California, while Juniper Networks is located in Sunnyvale, California.
In a joint statement, HPE and Juniper criticized the DOJ’s analysis as “fundamentally flawed.”
They argue that the merger will lead to “greater innovation and choice for customers” and that the government’s perspective on the WLAN market is not fully reflective of the existing competitive landscape. The companies point out that at least eight other vendors could potentially serve the same market as HPE and Juniper, making it unlikely the merger would eliminate competition.
They also highlight that regulatory bodies in 14 jurisdictions have approved the deal, with no customer complaints reported.
“We will vigorously contest the Department of Justice’s overreaching interpretation of antitrust laws,” the companies stated in the announcement.
HPE and Juniper assert that the resultant combined entity would enhance national security by constructing core U.S.-based networking infrastructures and accelerating advancements in artificial intelligence and cloud-oriented solutions.
