Distressed Patriotic Flag Unisex T-Shirt - Celebrate Comfort and Country $11.29 USD Get it here>>
Three former Michigan secretaries of state issued a joint statement this week urging a “No” vote on a citizen-initiated ballot proposition called Proposal 2.
If approved by voters on Nov. 8, Proposal 2 would, among other things, amend the state constitution in order to legalize private funding of elections, require absentee ballot drop boxes in every community, and effectively do away with mandatory photo identification for in-person voters.
Proposal 2 would allow a would-be voter to present a signed affidavit attesting to his or her identity instead of a state-issued photo ID.
For 24 years prior to the 2018 election of Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, the office was held by Republicans.
On Oct. 24, Benson’s three GOP predecessors announced their opposition to Proposal 2.
“This is a dangerous proposal [that] would prohibit us from ever requiring photo ID to vote, said former Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, who now serves as chairperson of the elections committee in the State Senate.
Voter ID requirements are very popular with the people of Michigan.
A statewide poll conducted in May 2021 by the Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Glengariff Group found that 79.7 percent of Michigan registered voters surveyed supported the photo ID requirement for every in-person voter.
In October 2021, the GOP-controlled state legislature passed a bill requiring that a photo ID be presented in order to vote in person.
The bill also would have furnished a free state-issued photo ID card to any voter who needed one.
The measure was vetoed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat.
Whitmer has vetoed over half a dozen election integrity bills sent to her desk by the Michigan legislature, contending that they are nothing but “voter suppression” and that they perpetuate the “Big Lie” that the 2020 presidential election was somehow stolen.
Another former Republican secretary of state, Terri Lynn Land, currently a member of the Wayne State University Board of Governors, said in the joint statement, “Proposal 2 would allow non-governmental third parties to fund our elections … allowing special interest groups to pay for them.”
“People want fair and impartial elections and allowing special interest groups to pay for them is 100 percent in conflict with that.”
Opponents of Proposal 2 point out that it contains no requirement that private donations be divided equally between communities—something Republicans fear would benefit the state’s Democrat-controlled large cities.
Candice Miller, als0 a former secretary of state and U.S. congresswoman, who now serves as the Macomb County Public Works Commissioner, said, “This proposal would instruct clerks to mail absentee ballots, rather than applications, to many voters each year.”
According to Miller, mailing out actual ballots before they have been requested by a voter is problematic.
“Voters who have moved or died would be mailed ballots … and that is not a good idea,” she said.
The main backers of Proposal 2 are the Michigan chapters of the League of Women Voters, the NAACP, and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Shelli Weisberg, political director of the ACLU of Michigan, wrote on the organization’s website that the provisions of Proposal 2 “are common-sense measures…[that] will block the ability of partisan election deniers to interfere in the outcome of an election.”
Weisberg stated, “If passed, Prop. 2 will: create nine days of in-person early voting … [and] provide state funding for secure ballot drop boxes, postage for absentee ballots, and absentee ballot tracking.”
According to Weisberg, Proposal 2 would also count ballots from military and overseas voters that are postmarked by election day and received within six days of the election.
She said Proposal 2 would “allow voters to request an absentee ballot for all future elections.”
Spokesperson Jamie Roe of SecureMiVote, a coalition of citizens opposed to Proposal 2, told The Epoch Times in an Oct. 25 phone interview, “The voters of Michigan need to see through the carefully crafted, positive sounding language of the proposal.
“In reality, Proposal 2 would make unconstitutional every bill passed by the legislature, and vetoed by Whitmer, that was designed to bring greater integrity and security to our elections.
“Given the deplorable condition of Michigan’s voter roll—with move-aways and dead people remaining on the list for decades—by far the most dangerous part of the proposal is the section that allows a voter to sign a one-time application for an absentee ballot, and then be mailed an absentee ballot for every subsequent election forever.”
Benson drew the ire of election integrity advocates when she mailed at taxpayer’s expense an absentee ballot application to every registered voter in the state in the 2020 election cycle.
She is also being sued by the Public Interest Legal Foundation for her failure to remove over 25,975 dead people from Michigan voter rolls.