US News

Federal Judge Refuses to Intervene in Dismissals of CIA Officers Involved in DEI Initiatives


U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga in Virginia had earlier enacted an administrative stay to halt the firings.

On Thursday, a federal judge refused to issue a temporary restraining order that would have prolonged the suspension of the terminations for numerous CIA officers involved in diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives, which were mandated to be abolished by President Donald Trump.

U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga in Virginia previously issued an administrative stay to pause the firings in response to a lawsuit filed by career intelligence officers who had been temporarily assigned to DEIA-related roles within the CIA and the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
In a ruling on Feb. 27, Judge Trenga stated that he had turned down the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction that could have stopped the agencies from terminating their employment while the legal proceedings were still ongoing.

The judge also extended the deadline for the plaintiffs to decide on a deferred resignation program, allowing them to receive compensation until September 30.

Trenga did not specify the reasons behind his ruling in the order. He indicated that the decision was made after reviewing “the filings, the record in this case, and the oral arguments” presented before the court.

Kevin Carroll, a former CIA undercover officer representing the plaintiffs, informed reporters on Thursday that Trenga had ruled that CIA Director John Ratcliffe possesses “sweeping statutory authority” to dismiss CIA officers if deemed necessary for national interests.

The Epoch Times attempted to contact Carroll and the CIA for comments but did not receive responses before publication time.

Carroll had previously disclosed that the plaintiffs were among the 51 CIA officers put on paid administrative leave starting January 22, following Trump’s issuance of an executive order that declared existing DEIA programs “illegal and immoral.”
As per the court document, the plaintiffs were instructed to report to the CIA visitors’ center with their intelligence community (IC) access badges by February 14, where they were presented with three options: retire immediately, accept a deferred resignation option, or face termination on May 20. Their decision was required by February 19.

The plaintiffs claimed that their pending terminations were not based on national security justifications but rather stemmed from their temporary DEIA-related roles and “a domestic political dispute between the Republican and Democratic parties over the effectiveness and legality of DEIA initiatives” within the federal framework.

They argued that the terminations were “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion” and lacked factual basis, which they believed infringed upon their constitutional rights as outlined in the First and Fifth Amendments.

“None of these officers’ actions was or is unlawful. At no point did the agencies employing the plaintiffs assert that they personally engaged in any violation of conduct, nor have they been charged with poor performance,” they asserted in their court statement.

In his executive order, Trump stated that the prior administration had imposed “illegal and immoral discrimination programs” upon nearly “all aspects” of the federal government through DEI agendas.

The order demands that federal agencies eliminate all offices and positions associated with environmental justice and any equity-related plans, grants, or contracts within 60 days of its issuance.

Additionally, it requires agencies to compile a list of entities that received federal support to implement DEI and environmental justice initiatives since January 20, 2021, alongside federal contractors who offered DEI training to their staff.

Following this order, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released a memo on January 21 directing federal agencies to place DEI employees on paid leave by January 22 and to eliminate all DEI-related websites and social media platforms by that date.

Trump’s order aligns with his campaign promise to abolish considerations like race and gender in HR practices, advocating for merit-based selection systems instead.

Tom Ozimek and Reuters contributed to this report.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.