US News

Judge Rejects Jan. 6 Defendant’s Bid to Attend Trump Inauguration


The judge ruled that Russell Taylor’s cooperation and commendable behavior do not grant him permission to travel to Washington for the inauguration.

A federal judge has rejected a request from a defendant involved in the Jan. 6 events to visit Washington for President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, a journey that requires court consent due to his probation terms.

Russell Taylor, who entered a guilty plea for conspiracy related to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, sought approval to accompany his wife and children to the ceremony set for Jan. 20, during which Trump is to be sworn in for a second term.

Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke Huish, mentioned in a court filing that Taylor has expressed remorse, has completed his home confinement, complies with his three-year probation terms, and was invited to the inauguration by former Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah).
However, District Judge Royce C. Lamberth denied the request in an order dated Jan. 3.

The judge pointed out the “particular nature and severity” of Taylor’s actions during the Capitol riot, recalling Taylor’s admission that his intention on Jan. 6, 2021, was to “intimidate” Congressional members and compel them to reject the certification of then-President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election. Lamberth highlighted Taylor’s plans to storm the Capitol, carry weapons and body armor, encourage others to arm themselves, breach police barricades, and threaten law enforcement during violent confrontations.

“This summary illustrates Mr. Taylor’s extraordinarily serious conduct,” the judge noted. “While he did not directly attack law enforcement, he threatened them and incited other rioters who were actively assaulting officers.”

While acknowledging that Taylor had “commendably” accepted responsibility and cooperated with investigators, resulting in a considerably lenient probationary sentence compared to his co-defendants, Judge Lamberth reiterated that these factors do not permit him to attend the inauguration.

“Granting such permission to someone who carried weapons and threatened law enforcement to disrupt the previous Inauguration, while glorifying ‘insurrection’ against the United States, would not be appropriate,” Lamberth stated.

The judge mentioned he considered the invitation letter from Stewart, which praised Taylor’s character, but deemed it of “marginal” significance regarding the request to travel for the inauguration.

In his letter to the judge, Stewart described Taylor as a man of “integrity and faith” who values his family, faith, and love for the country as his highest priorities. He noted that three other current Utah congressional members supported the invitation for Taylor to attend the inauguration.
After the ruling, Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke Huish, informed various media that his client felt “disappointed” but holds the “utmost respect” for the judge and his decision.

Other defendants from Jan. 6, including Cindy Young and Christopher Belliveau, have also tried to obtain permission to attend the inauguration.

The Justice Department generally opposes these requests. In Young’s case, who was found guilty on four misdemeanor charges, government attorneys assert that she poses a “danger to the D.C. community” and to law enforcement. Similar reasoning is being applied against Belliveau’s request in a motion.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.