US News

Most U.S. Aid Programs Worldwide Halted Following Trump’s Directive | US News


The United States State Department has implemented a suspension on new funding for nearly all American foreign development assistance following an executive order from Donald Trump.

Shortly after his inauguration on Monday, the US president mandated a 90-day pause on American-funded global projects. This is intended to review their effectiveness and to ensure alignment with his foreign policy.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s directive does not include funding for emergency food programs and military support for Israel and Egypt. However, it remains uncertain how this will influence the vital flow of US military assistance to Ukraine as it confronts Russia’s invasion.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Pic: Reuters
Image:
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Pic: Reuters

Under Joe Biden’s administration, military aid to Ukraine was increased before he left office due to uncertainties regarding Mr Trump’s commitment to fund Kyiv.

About $3.85 billion (£3 billion) in funding for upcoming arms shipments to Ukraine—authorized by the US Congress—remains available, but it remains unclear whether Mr Trump will utilize it.

The US leads the world in foreign aid, budgeting approximately $60 billion (£48 billion), which accounts for 1% of the US budget, for 2023.

The exemption for emergency food programs comes as humanitarian aid floods into the Gaza Strip following the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, and amidst famine in war-affected Sudan.

Nonetheless, the order has faced criticism from humanitarian leaders for failing to exclude life-saving health initiatives such as clinics and vaccination programs.

Abby Maxman, head of Oxfam America, cautioned that halting funding “could have life or death implications” for families and children globally.

“By suspending foreign development assistance, the Trump administration jeopardizes the lives and futures of communities in crisis, undermining the United States’ long-standing bipartisan approach to foreign assistance that prioritizes need over politics,” she stated.

Explore more from Sky News:
Shackled men led onto US military jet as immigration arrests surge
‘Unduly lenient’ sentence of Southport killer under review
Trump mandates the release of JFK assassination files

The impact on military aid to Ukraine is likely to be minimal

At first glance, this decision seems poised to have far-reaching effects on the distribution of US aid globally.

Officials from the State Department and the US Agency for International Development (USAID) are actively assessing the potential impacts of this directive.

The ramifications are expected to be widespread across the extensive foreign assistance portfolio.

We anticipate notable disarray within USAID offices worldwide, as well as among government agencies in recipient nations.

Regarding Ukraine, the military assistance provided is unlikely to be significantly impacted, as it is facilitated through a mechanism known as “presidential drawdown,” rather than a foreign assistance grant.

Former President Joe Biden also aimed to “pre-load” his administration’s support for Ukraine to insulate it from such policy fluctuations.

However, the new directive may affect economic assistance for Ukraine and other initiatives such as de-mining efforts.

We should expect numerous unexpected policy changes in various areas as Mr Trump’s team assumes control. Understanding the full impact of these decisions will take time.

Mr Rubio’s order, communicated via a cable to US embassies globally, indicated that the pause was needed to ensure “appropriations are not duplicated, are effective, and are consistent with President Trump’s foreign policy”.

Standards for reviewing all foreign assistance are anticipated to be established within the upcoming month to ensure alignment with President Trump’s policy agenda,” the global cable disclosed.

The comprehensive government review is expected to conclude within three months, generating a report for Mr Rubio to present recommendations to Mr Trump.


The outcomes could considerably affect the distribution of US foreign assistance and its global implications.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.