US News

Several Senate Republicans Appear Hesitant on Key Trump Defense Nominee


Should he be confirmed, Elbridge Colby is expected to play a pivotal role in advising the Secretary of Defense and influencing U.S. national security policies.

WASHINGTON—Some Republicans may still require persuasion before they can endorse President Donald Trump’s nominee for a significant Pentagon strategy role.

Elbridge Colby is scheduled to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 4, as the Senate deliberates on his nomination to become the under-secretary of defense for policy.

If confirmed, Colby would act as the primary defense policy adviser for the Secretary of Defense and assist in formulating U.S. national security policies.

Coly’s nomination has seemingly divided elected Republicans and conservative commentators.

Conservative commentator Charlie Kirk expressed on the X social media platform on Feb. 16, suggesting that Colby’s nomination is a vital element in the attempt to halt a “Bush/Cheney cabal” within the Department of Defense.

Kirk has accused Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) of attempting to undermine Trump by opposing Colby’s confirmation in the Senate.

During a podcast interview with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Feb. 18, Cotton stated that one of his primary concerns is to ensure Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons.

Cotton remarked that he and Trump share a common stance against a nuclear-capable Iran.

As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Cotton mentioned that his priority with any nominee for a national security role is to ensure that nominees align with those views.

“I look forward to discussing with [Colby] what he has previously written regarding Iran, his current thoughts, and how his views align with President Trump’s stated priority of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons,” Cotton stated.

Since his podcast appearance, Cotton has not disclosed whether he has met with Colby to address any concerns about Colby’s stance on Iran.

In a subsequent discussion on a podcast with Fox News Radio’s Will Cain, Cotton mentioned “other issues” he wishes to explore with Colby.

Previously, the Arkansas Republican and Colby have had differing views on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and NATO.

In 2023, when Cotton endorsed cluster munitions for Ukraine, asserting they were vital “for Ukrainian forces to overcome Putin’s invasion,” Colby expressed more criticism of the decision, suggesting that the U.S. seemed to have “raised expectations for maximal objectives” while only being “prepared to deliver on the latter.”
Furthermore, while Cotton advocated for Sweden and Finland’s admission to NATO, Colby questioned the significance of that shift and later stated it was “not a significant victory that transformed the geopolitical landscape.”

Cotton declined a request for comment from The Epoch Times on March 3.

Colby’s Foreign Policy Views

Trump already has an established rapport with Colby, who was part of his first administration.

From 2017 to 2018, Colby held the position of deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development at the Pentagon.

During his tenure at the Pentagon, Colby contributed to the development of the Trump administration’s 2017 National Security Strategy and the Defense Department’s 2018 National Defense Strategy.

Outside government, Colby has provided insights and analysis on national security policies for various think tanks and news outlets.

In a July 2023 op-ed published in The Times of Israel, Colby advocated for a U.S. national security strategy that pivots away from the Middle East and towards addressing potential conflicts with China in the Indo-Pacific.

“America should be ready to provide substantial material and political support to Israel. However, Israel must understand that the United States, which cannot be drawn into another Middle Eastern conflict, will assume a supportive role,” Colby stated.

In a 2010 essay for Foreign Policy, Colby explored ways the U.S. could continue to deter Iran, even if Tehran were to acquire nuclear capabilities.
Iran's Natanz nuclear facility in a satellite photo on April 7, 2021. (Planet Labs Inc. via AP)

Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility in a satellite photo on April 7, 2021. Planet Labs Inc. via AP

“Containment isn’t the ideal outcome—successfully preventing Iran’s acquisition is. However, if the only way to achieve that is through a likely ineffectual military campaign against Iran’s nuclear efforts, or, heaven forbid, an invasion, the arduous work of containment can serve as a lesser of two evils,” he articulated at the time.

After Kirk voiced concerns about Colby’s nomination last month, political commentator Park MacDougald took to X, claiming that Trump’s nominee “represents a sort of bipartisan establishment figure whose foundations lie in the Obama Democratic Party.”

MacDougald highlighted Colby’s tenure at the Center For A New American Security (CNAS) think tank prior to and following his time in the Trump administration.

MacDougald characterized CNAS as former President Barack Obama’s “preferred think tank,” and asserted that Colby supported Jeb Bush’s 2016 presidential campaign.

“I suspect that Cotton’s objections relate more to elevating a Democrat than to defending a mythical ‘Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD’ that has somehow endured the past 16 years of Democratic dominance,” MacDougald stated in a Feb. 16 post on X.

In response to MacDougald’s critiques, Vice President JD Vance came to Colby’s defense.

“Bridge has consistently held accurate views on the significant foreign policy debates over the past two decades. He was critical of the Iraq War, which rendered him unemployable in the conservative movement of the 2000s,” Vance asserted in a Feb. 16 post on X.

“He developed a relationship with CNAS when it was among the few institutions willing to employ a foreign policy realist.”

Donald Trump Jr. has also shown support for his father’s nominee.

In a Feb. 18 op-ed for Human Events, Trump Jr. stated that both Colby and his father oppose a nuclear-capable Iran.

“Similarly, Colby shares my father’s desire to avoid a significant Middle Eastern conflict if at all feasible,” Trump Jr. noted.

“Like my father, he does not seek out war; he is pragmatic, strong, and aims for non-military solutions whenever possible.”

Where Republican Lawmakers Line Up

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who previously was part of the Senate Armed Services Committee, recently conveyed to The Epoch Times that he supports Colby’s nomination.

Regarding the stance of his fellow Republicans, Hawley was uncertain.

“I’m going to vote for [Colby] with enthusiasm, but I’m unsure. I’m not on that committee anymore, so I lack insight into how the vote count stands,” Hawley expressed.

President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington on Jan. 14, 2025. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington on Jan. 14, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

Cotton’s opinions on Colby could influence other Republican senators who have yet to disclose their positions.

When asked about Colby’s nomination last week, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) stated, “I’m going to discuss it with Sen. Cotton and understand his perspective, and I’ll get back to you.”

When contacted for comment last week, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) pointed out that some Republican senators have previously expressed reservations about Trump’s other nominees before ultimately supporting the president’s choices.

Mullin predicted that a similar pattern would transpire with Colby’s nomination.

“We’ve managed to work through all those concerns,” the Oklahoma Republican affirmed.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.