US News

The Impact of Trump’s Executive Orders on California


State officials are responding to the president’s latest directives regarding water regulations, border security, and gender issues, among other topics.

In the early hours of his second term, President Donald Trump enacted an unprecedented number of executive orders that could significantly influence California, with implications seen by both supporters and detractors in areas like gender policy, border security, and more.

During his inaugural address, the president addressed the ongoing wildfires in Southern California, highlighting them as a pressing issue that would prompt additional emergency orders in the near future.

“[W]e are witnessing fires continue to devastate areas from weeks prior without even a semblance of defense,” Trump stated. “They are consuming homes and communities, impacting even some of the most affluent and influential individuals in our nation, some of whom are present here today.”

He acknowledged the difficulties faced by countless individuals who have lost their homes, assuring that assistance is forthcoming.

“No one is able to address it,” Trump stated. “That is going to change.”

At a press conference focused on infrastructure investments, he pledged to “support Los Angeles” and mentioned a possible visit to the city on Jan. 24.

Trump criticized the state’s water management strategies for worsening fire risks.

“I believe they are politically finished. What they have executed has ruined the city,” he remarked.

The president suggested that water from the Pacific Northwest, which currently runs into the ocean, should be redirected to serve California.

“Los Angeles has significant water resources, all they need to do is turn the valve,” Trump asserted. “We will be issuing an executive order instructing them to immediately release that water through California.”

A spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office informed The Epoch Times via email on Jan. 23 that there is no water scarcity in Southern California, disputing the claim that merely turning a valve could help manage fire hazards in the state.

“Transferring more water from Northern California would not impact the response to wildfires. Water operations in the Delta are unrelated to local fire responses in Los Angeles,” the spokesperson stated.

Prioritizing People Over Fish

One of Trump’s executive orders directs the secretaries of Commerce and Interior to collaborate with the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and the Bureau of Reclamation, among other bodies, to facilitate increased water delivery from the San Joaquin Delta in Northern California to various regions across the state.

“My administration’s strategy would have enabled vast amounts of water from snowmelt and rainwater in Northern California rivers for beneficial use in the Central Valley and Southern California,” Trump elaborated. “This catastrophic halt was supposedly in the name of protecting the delta smelt and other fish species.”

President Trump speaks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on Jan. 21. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

President Trump speaks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on Jan. 21. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

He claimed that the focus on the smelt led to water being diverted to the Pacific Ocean rather than to farms and communities across the Golden State.

Initial Lawsuits Filed

Among the recent actions, the Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship order has prompted legal challenges from nearly two dozen states and several cities in a lawsuit submitted on Jan. 21 in a U.S. District Court in Massachusetts.

“The president’s executive order to revoke birthright citizenship is manifestly unconstitutional and, quite frankly, un-American,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is one of the architects of the lawsuit, stated in a statement. “The president has severely overstepped his authority with this order, and we will hold him accountable.”
Newsom labeled the decree “unconstitutional” in a statement.
Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at Shasta College on Dec. 16. (Travis Gillmore/The Epoch Times)

Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at Shasta College on Dec. 16. Travis Gillmore/The Epoch Times

The president’s directive reinterprets the 14th Amendment to prevent citizenship for individuals whose parents were not citizens or lawful permanent residents at the time of birth.

“We are the only nation worldwide that does this concerning birthright … and it is absurd,” Trump stated while signing the order in the Oval Office on Jan. 20.
While the order was slated to take effect on Feb. 19, a U.S. District Court in Seattle temporarily blocked its implementation with a restraining order issued on Jan. 23.

Securing the Border

Through a series of directives, the president has declared a national emergency at the southern border, initiating actions to deport violent offenders and block the influx of illegal immigrants.

The Secretary of Defense has been instructed to deploy military and National Guard resources to the border.

President Trump inspects border wall prototypes in San Diego on March 13, 2018. (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)

President Trump inspects border wall prototypes in San Diego on March 13, 2018. Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

Further orders require agencies to complete the border wall’s construction and support air missions.

Another order mandates that law enforcement officials “take all necessary measures to immediately repel, repatriate, and remove illegal aliens across the southern border of the United States,” as per a statement from the White House.

Some lawmakers within the state’s Democratic Party have pushed back against the president’s directives.

“California has no duty to enforce Trump’s mass deportation policies & California will not comply,” state Sen. Scott Wiener posted on Jan. 22 on X. “Trump’s threats won’t alter reality.”
Another directive underscores the risks to national security, public health, and safety, as well as the financial burdens placed on states that provide resources for illegal immigrants.
In 2022, California expended nearly $23 billion in benefits for illegal immigrants, according to a report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a nonpartisan public interest group based in Washington, D.C.
Despite reports of Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity surfacing in major urban centers nationally, including San Francisco, Oakland, and Los Angeles, no operations have been confirmed in California up to this point.

Targeting Cartels

Trump enacted an executive order classifying cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, aimed at equipping law enforcement with enhanced tools to combat sophisticated criminal networks.

“The cartels have launched a violent and terror-filled campaign throughout the Western Hemisphere that has not only destabilized countries crucial to our national interests but also flooded the United States with dangerous drugs, violent offenders, and brutal gangs,” the order states. “The cartels effectively control, through a campaign of assassination, terror, rape, and brute strength nearly all illegal traffic across the southern U.S. border.”

These cartels have amassed such power in Mexico that they “function as quasi-governmental entities,” the order notes.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) holds a news conference on his proposed legislation to designate Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, at the U.S. Capitol on March 8, 2023. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) holds a news conference on his proposed legislation to designate Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, at the U.S. Capitol on March 8, 2023. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

“The activities of the cartels jeopardize the safety of the American populace, the security of the United States, and the stability of the international order in the Western Hemisphere,” Trump wrote. “Their operations, along with their encroachments into the physical territory of the United States, present an unacceptable national security threat.”

In response, he declared a state of emergency and ordered U.S. agencies “to ensure the total eradication of these organizations’ presence in the United States and their ability to pose threats through their extraterritorial command-and-control frameworks.”

Some California law enforcement officials indicated that the administration’s stance could provide the necessary support to tackle the cartel challenges in certain regions.

“I believe it will assist in acquiring federal support against drug trafficking organizations,” Mendocino County Sheriff Matt Kendall expressed to The Epoch Times. “However, federal involvement often fluctuates, and they don’t always engage in problems that require their attention.”

Mitigating the harms caused by cartels, particularly the distribution of fentanyl, is a priority for the new administration.

Trump proposed imposing 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 10 percent tariffs on China in addition to those already in place if the flow of fentanyl is not halted.

Anticipated Efficiency Cuts

One action establishing the Department of Government Efficiency raises concerns about the future of almost 150,000 federal employees in California—according to Pew Research Center data.

In the charge of this department, Elon Musk has indicated that significant cuts may be forthcoming, with Trump ordering all employees to return to the office.

“The pressing question will be where they will return to work,” noted Harry Klaff, U.S. president of real estate services firm Avison Young.

According to Klaff, the office vacancy rates remain considerably higher than pre-pandemic levels due to remote working among government employees.

The reduction in office attendance has implications for leasing rates, property valuations, and local economies, he added.

As the largest property leaseholder nationwide, the General Services Administration oversees over 360 million square feet across around 8,400 properties. In California, the agency manages government facilities, including courthouses and ports of entry, among others.
The Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Los Angeles on May 26, 2023. (Annie Wang/The Epoch Times)

The Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Los Angeles on May 26, 2023. Annie Wang/The Epoch Times

If the Trump administration aggressively cancels leases for underutilized properties, the repercussions may ripple across the industry, experts warn.

“It could affect the market, but the effects might be more localized to D.C.,” Klaff suggested.

Moreover, federal funding for projects such as the state’s high-speed rail initiative could also be at risk, given that critics have labeled the endeavor a financial “boondoggle.”

Rejecting Gender Ideology

Trump enacted an order asserting that the U.S. government recognizes solely two genders: male and female.

“Throughout the nation, ideologues denying the biological reality of sex have been increasingly employing legal and socially coercive measures to allow men to self-identify as women and access single-sex spaces and activities reserved for women, from domestic abuse shelters to workplace restrooms,” the order articulates. “This is erroneous.”

The mandate asserts that schools allowing biological males to participate in women’s sports could risk losing Title IX funding, contending that such denials of “biological reality” undermine women’s “dignity, safety, and well-being.”

“Consequently, my administration will defend women’s rights and honor freedom of conscience by implementing clear and factual language and policies that acknowledge that women are biologically female, and men are biologically male,” Trump stated. “These sexes are immutable and grounded in fundamental, incontrovertible reality.”

Sen. Wiener, an openly gay lawmaker advocating for transgender rights, criticized the order.

“Trump’s [executive order] directs, through government power, the assertion that trans individuals do not exist: That a person cannot transition to a gender different from their birth-assigned gender,” he tweeted on Jan. 21. “It’s difficult to overstate how radical this is: A governmental decree that a segment of the population simply does not exist.”

State Readies Response

On Jan. 23, California’s Legislature passed a bill, introduced in a special session convened by the governor in December, allocating $25 million to the attorney general to contest federal policies deemed unconstitutional or harmful to the state.

Nevertheless, Newsom has consistently expressed his readiness to collaborate with the Trump administration where feasible.

“As our country experiences the peaceful transfer of power, we are reminded of the lasting principles that uphold our democracy: seeking common ground and striving for shared objectives,” he expressed in a statement. “Where our common principles align, my administration stands prepared to partner with the Trump-Vance administration to deliver solutions and serve the almost 40 million Californians we represent together.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.