US News

Two Judges Restrict Trump’s Deportation Powers Under Wartime Legislation


New legal actions have been initiated in Texas and New York following the Supreme Court’s removal of barriers in Washington.

Two federal judges have curtailed the Trump administration’s utilization of the Alien Enemies Act—a wartime statute that grants the president the authority to detain and remove noncitizens—to deport individuals in Texas and New York who filed lawsuits after the Supreme Court lifted analogous orders from Washington.

U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez, serving in the Southern District of Texas, stated in an order dated April 9 that the removal of individuals under Trump’s March 15 proclamation, which invoked the Alien Enemies Act to declare an invasion of the United States by the Venezuelan gang Tren De Aragua, would “cause immediate and irreparable injury to the removed individuals.”

This order is set to expire on April 23, though an extension is possible.

It applies to three Venezuelan plaintiffs and others facing removal from a Texas detention center.

On the same day, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein issued a comparable order following a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union concerning two plaintiffs detained in New York.

These actions coincided with the Supreme Court’s decision to vacate two orders from a federal judge in Washington that had obstructed Trump’s capacity to deport individuals under the March 15 proclamation.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court expressed that the case was improperly filed, highlighting that the plaintiffs were confined in Texas and asserting that those contesting the administration’s actions should do so in the district where they are held.

The court’s unsigned opinion also mandated that the administration must provide notice to the detainees.

“Detainees must be informed after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act,” the Supreme Court’s opinion stated.

“The notice should be provided within a reasonable timeframe and in a manner that allows them to seek habeas relief in the appropriate venue before such removal takes place.”

Habeas relief refers to a legal means for detainees to contest their detention.

Attorney General Pam Bondi commended the Supreme Court’s verdict and declared on social media platform X on April 7 that “the American people can be assured” that she, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Border Czar Tom Homan “will mobilize our resources to search the country for any remains of Tren De Aragua and DEPORT THEM.”

The lawsuit in Washington had pursued a different legal path, while the recent actions in Texas and New York aimed for relief through habeas.

In Rodriguez’s order, he noted that no immigration court had issued a final removal order against the three plaintiffs—referred to as “J.A.V.,” “J.G.G.,” and “W.G.H.” —though the government attempted to remove them based on Trump’s proclamation at least once.

In Washington, the administration informed U.S. District Judge James Boasberg that it had deported numerous others under legal authority distinct from the Alien Enemies Act.

Rodriguez mentioned in his order that without an injunction to halt the administration’s actions, the individuals “would be unable to seek habeas relief.”

The plaintiffs in the New York case similarly voiced concerns regarding the government potentially removing individuals without the necessary judicial oversight.

The Department of Justice did not respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comments prior to publication.

Trump has previously stated that he would comply with court orders.



Source link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.