Alberta expresses concern that Federal Pandemic Prevention Bill could have a damaging impact on the Agricultural Sector.
The Alberta government is warning that aspects of a federal pandemic prevention bill before Parliament encroach on the province’s constitutional jurisdiction, posing a particular threat to its agricultural industry.
“These proposed changes could devastate Alberta’s agricultural industry with huge negative consequences on producers, processors, and our entire provincial economy,” Sigurdson said.
He said he has written to Alberta’s senators, the federal agriculture minister, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and Health Canada to share the province’s concerns about the bill and asked the Senate to consider amending the bill “so we can avoid any unintended consequences.”
Bill C-293, introduced in June 2022 by Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, passed third reading 164-144 on June 5. The bill has not yet gone before the Senate.
The legislation is intended to “prevent the risk of and prepare for future pandemics” by establishing surveillance systems for infectious diseases, supporting local public health capacity building, training health-care workers to deal with sudden increases in patient volume, reporting on pandemic preparedness manufacturing capacities, identifying “key drivers of pandemic risk,” and describing “how Canadian activities, domestic and abroad, contribute to the risk.”
The bill requires the agriculture minister and the industry minister to provide measures to reduce risks from antimicrobial resistance, regulate commercial activities like industrial animal agriculture that can contribute to pandemic risks, and promote the “production of alternative proteins” that do not carry the same pandemic risks.
Opposition by Agricultural Groups
Alberta Health Minister Adriana LaGrange told the press conference Bill C-293 was drafted “despite a lack of consultation” with provinces and territories, and the bill’s unclear language could lead to “dangerous interpretation and misuse of political and administrative powers during vulnerable times.”
The legislation could also intrude on the province’s jurisdiction for managing its health-care system during public health emergencies, LaGrange said. “It is crucial to create plans that minimize the effects of future pandemics for everyone. However, these plans must take into account the unique challenges faced by each jurisdiction.”
Alberta agriculture representatives also criticized the bill, with Alberta Chicken Producers Chair David Hyink saying the legislation “could potentially threaten the livelihoods of farm families.”
Alberta Beef Producers Vice Chair Doug Roxburgh said Bill C-293 shows “a clear bias against livestock industries.”
“Let us make sure we never surrender our sovereignty over the rights to our approach to any kind of a health crisis in this country and make sure that we are best prepared now by learning the difficult lessons to be learned coming out of COVID,” he said.
Bloc Québécois MP Sylvie Bérubé also raised jurisdictional concerns with some aspects of the bill, saying, “We want to ensure that Ottawa does not overstep its jurisdiction.”
Defending his bill, Erskine-Smith said it’s important to be prepared when facing the unknown.
“If we remember, we will remember the army having to go into nursing homes. We will remember the fear of the unknown that we all experienced. We will remember the great scale of loss,” he said.