Brampton Doctor to Appeal Ontario Court Affirmation of Rebukes Over Lockdown Tweets

Brampton Doctor Appeals Ontario Court’s Confirmation of Rebukes for Lockdown Tweets

May 13, 2024 TruthUSA

A Brampton doctor, with financial backing from Elon Musk, intends to challenge an Ontario court’s decision not to remove three cautions placed on her public file by medical regulators due to her criticism of COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccines on social media.

Doctor Kulvinder Kaur Gill announced in a tweet that she will appeal the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s divisional court ruling made on May 13 that upheld the three cautions placed on her public file by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for her tweets in 2020.

Dr. Gill, who revealed in March about receiving financial support from X, Elon Musk’s social media company, for her legal fees, emphasized that she has exhausted her life savings fighting lawsuits and smear campaigns.

Dr. Gill’s lawyer Lisa Bildy stated that while X has agreed to fund the appeal, permission from the Court of Appeal is necessary after the divisional court’s ruling.

Ms. Bildy mentioned that the focus of the upcoming argument will be on the divisional court’s errors rather than those of the CPSO screening committee.

Dr. Gill, known for questioning COVID measures, argued in court in April that the CPSO’s cautions were punitive and suppressed debate, aiming to have them revoked.

Related Stories

The Tide Turns: Research on COVID Vaccine Harms, Once a Taboo Subject, Now Appearing in Some Medical Journals

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules State COVID Emergency Declaration Was Lawful

The court’s decision on May 13 mentioned that the three cautions in question were related to Dr. Gill’s tweets on Twitter regarding COVID lockdowns in August 2020.

The court evaluated two specific tweets by Dr. Gill criticizing the lockdowns and questioning the necessity of vaccines at the time.

The court concluded that the CPSO’s actions were a reasonable balance between Dr. Gill’s free speech rights and professional responsibilities.

The court justified the cautions as protective measures for the public while minimally impacting Dr. Gill, stating that the response was proportionate.

Furthermore, the court dismissed Dr. Gill’s argument that the cautions were punitive, clarifying that they were educational and remedial in nature without signaling professional misconduct.

Libertas Law highlighted in a press release on May 13 that the court did not consider the evolving nature of cautions becoming public rebukes instead of private corrections.

Dr. Gill’s appeal, backed by Elon Musk due to the support of free expression on the X platform, will be assisted by Libertas Law.

Legal battles involving Dr. Gill’s advocacy attracted X’s attention in March, leading to the company offering financial assistance for her legal expenses.

X stated that they will fund Dr. Gill’s campaign to cover her legal fees and judgment amount.

Libertas Law asserted that Dr. Gill’s tweet about not needing a vaccine was misinterpreted and taken out of context.

Despite being branded as an “anti-vaxxer,” Dr. Gill has been a supporter of routine childhood vaccines in her professional practice.

Dr. Gill faced numerous investigations and disciplinary actions by the CPSO starting in August 2020 due to her online activism, according to Libertas Law.

The law firm also noted a malicious online campaign against Dr. Gill by other practitioners, media, and the public, resulting in complaints to the CPSO.

The CPSO was not immediately available for comment.

Source link