Canada’s $10-Day Child Care Program Limits Family Choice: Think Tank

The national $10-a-day child care program favours some care providers over others, effectively discriminating against some families and their choices, says the think tank Cardus.

Cardus published a policy brief Jan. 18 calling on Alberta to renegotiate its agreement on the program with the federal government to include all types of child care. All the other provinces and territories have signed similar agreements.

“Taxpayer money is currently allocated based on the style of child care chosen, violating the principle of free choice without discrimination based on lifestyle choices,” Cardus said in a report it published in 2021, cited in the recent brief.

Under the program, the government has started paying 50 percent of child care fees on average. It aims by 2026 to have parents pay only $10 per day. That’s an estimated savings per child of $8,610 annually in Alberta, and $9,000 in Ontario.

But in Ontario, only government-licensed daycares are eligible. And in Alberta, the restrictions have sidelined many for-profit daycares.

Cardus said in its brief that the government should ensure the $8,000–$9,000 “follows the child, not spaces.”

“Given the diverse forms of care that parents are already choosing, the most equitable approach the government can take is to fund families directly,” Cardus said.

Ontario and Alberta are the provinces with the fewest children under 6 in formal child care, with 41 percent and 46 percent respectively, according to Statistics Canada. The majority of children are cared for by other methods, whether by parents, extended family, or some other arrangement.

“The majority of children in the province do not benefit from the agreement,” Cardus said of the situation in Alberta.

The Alberta child services ministry, which handles the program on the provincial level, did not reply to The Epoch Times inquiry as of publication.

The Child Care Providers Resource Network (CCPRN) made a similar plea when Ontario—the last province to sign on to the program—joined in March 2022. “CCPRN continues to advocate that the Conservative government fund families directly,” CCPRN Board President Brenda Burns said in a statement at the time.

Unlicensed and For-profit Care Providers Struggle

CCPRN says Ontario’s licensed child care sector currently only has capacity for 24 percent of the children in the province. Although the program includes the creation of more licensed spaces, it will take time for capacity to meet demand, which is expected to grow more due to the subsidy.

“Ontario parents rely on a variety of child care options to meet their needs,” Burns said. “Independent home child care providers have responded to these unique needs by offering consistent, flexible, high quality child care programs while contributing to Ontario’s economy as small business owners. This plan leaves thousands of Ontario families at a huge disadvantage and supports one group of women at the expense of another.”

The Ontario education ministry, which is responsible for the province’s rollout of the program, did not respond to The Epoch Times inquiry as of publication.

In Alberta, the program has included non-profit and existing for-profit centres, but new or expanded for-profits have been excluded. All for-profits will be included, however, pending a new framework it is developing with the federal government. The framework was supposed to be ready by the end of 2022 and has now been delayed until April.

Limits on how a centre can spend its money have been a point of contention for private centres, which account for 67 percent of child care centres in the province, according to the Association of Alberta Childcare Entrepreneurs (AACE).

AACE was formed in response to uncertainties about what this new program would mean for private operators. It says on its website that the program’s current framework “prevents private operators from increasing fees to at least meet inflation.” It places an expansion freeze on current private operators, creates “significant administrative burdens,” and prevents the businesses from dedicating needed funds to staffing.

“Alberta parents have chosen private operators, who offer unique services to parents and children—choice is fundamentally important to Albertans—anything that limits choice is unacceptable,” AACE says on its website.

“Any agreement that attempts to limit private operators is to the detriment of the sector, parents and children,” it said.

Women in the Workforce

The federal government’s stated purpose for the program is to help parents, particularly women, return to the workforce more quickly. “Studies show that for every dollar invested in early childhood education, the broader economy receives between $1.50 and $2.80 in return,” the government says in its description of the program.

Cardus and some others, however, say parental care in the early years of a child’s life should not be discouraged if it’s the family’s preference.

A mother by the name of Pieta Woolley wrote in an op-ed for Broadview, “If governments pay for institutional care but won’t compensate caregivers, there is no choice. To pay your bills, you have to stick your kids in care and go to work.”

She advocates for compensation of parents or other caregivers as well. “Caring isn’t just making snacks and changing diapers. It’s immersion in your culture, values and religion,” Woolley said. She said women should have the opportunity not only to go to work, but also “to experience the spiritual transformation that comes with slowing down and actively loving the people in your care.”

Cardus says the definition of “child care” should not exclude parental care. “Centres, public or private, not-for-profit or for-profit, home-based care, faith-based care, nannies, parents, and extended family: it’s all care, and the government does not prioritize one type over another; parents and families do.”