Federal Court Approves Lawsuit Challenging Travel Vaccine Mandate
A federal court has ruled that a lawsuit challenging the Liberal government’s now-suspended COVID-19 travel vaccine mandate can proceed to trial, after previous legal challenges were dismissed as moot.
The lawsuit was initiated by businessmen Karl Harrison and Shaun Rickard, who sought judicial review in December 2021. They were the first to challenge the constitutionality of the travel restrictions that prevented millions of unvaccinated Canadians from traveling within the country.
“While the chances of having vaccination status recognized as an analogous ground for the purposes of section 15 may be remote in light of the current jurisprudence, I am not satisfied that such an argument is bound to fail if the plaintiffs allege that vaccination would constitute an unacceptable cost to their personal identity, or would tear asunder immutable or even deeply held beliefs,” wrote Horne.
“We need to ensure that this can never happen again,” Harrison commented on the travel mandate in a statement to The Epoch Times. “The court will have to decide whether the unvaccinated are a protected class in Canada.”
Former Transport Minister Omar Alghabra and then-Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos have supported the vaccine mandate, citing its positive impact on reducing the spread of COVID-19 among travelers, workers, and communities. The Justice Department was reached out to for a response.
Government data suggests that the mandate had minimal effect on virus transmission, as the Omicron variant affected both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.
Noé Chartier contributed to this report.